Watch Debate – Should the Sex Offender Registry be Abolished?

  • This topic has 11 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 2 years ago by AvatarSteve Jobs inc..
Viewing 9 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #34468 Reply
      Fred
      Fred
      Admin
    • #34711 Reply
      Avatar
      Maestro

      This woman purposely avoided answering the question about muggers and arsonists. Wow! Is she part of Antifa ? The cowards who protest against the conservatives but run away from questions about why they’re protesting ?
      I love how the moderator stuck it to her with saying that arsonists burn down houses and those houses can have children in them.
      This country is stark raving mad about nothing more than SEX! SEX SEX SEX! That’s all we seem to care about! Burn my kids to death! Shoot my kids when you car jack me, but don’t you dare touch them in a SEXUAL way! (And when I say “kids” I don’t necessarily mean little tykes, I refer to teens who consent with older people also).

      SEX SEX SEX! The most horrible thing to ever happen to human kind!!!

      Unbelievable

    • #34748 Reply
      Avatar
      Saddles

      @Maestro. Ah maestro my friend, I wonder who’s burning down the house! While I hate debates myself I did want to listen on this type of debate since it talks about sex and offenses. Now who gave each person their sex & sexuality? Aside from that we all should know how to handle these Romeo and Juilet issues. But remember sex is only good in marriage?
      Do you not think everybody has had sex of some sort or cheated on their wife, girlfriend or whatever.. Sure David had his affair in the Bible, Sure Samson had his Deliah but no one wants to hear about that old stuff. Its a computer age today and a who’s right and who’s wrong in this day and age. Should we all be punished by this or that, oh as long as the police don’t catch us we will be ok, or as long as my wife or girl friend doesn’t find out I’m cheating on her.
      Well doesn’t our conscious convict us in different ways. I know you don’t like hearing this at times but we are all in a situation and NARSOL, and others are leading the cause in this topic that should be addressed today. Should we all say the internet is evil or is government at times spying on everyone these days thru this internet means.

      Your ok maestro and so are a lot of others on here. At times I believe we are all just trying to burn ourselves out over this … as you call it, sex, sex, sex …. and someone wants to be right and believe it or not only one can be right when you really understand about all these sex situations and don’t look at me as I don’t think – remember. And maestro sex has been that way all thru history sex, sex, sex but don’t we still have justice and I mean true justice thats not watered down.

    • #34752 Reply
      Avatar
      Trish

      The 150 victim’s from the doc…! Is the exception! And if the le and FBI, etc…..was honest and corrected for illegal activity everyone would see for themselves that self incrimination by coercion has beer seen applied for years and should have been stoped ! What person cannot see the abuse and misuse of powers! The child advocate spoke about children being abused, but failed to see and understand we are a nation of laws not only for children but everyone. …excluding convicted people ! Justice for ALL ! Also the public registry should be compared to a law enforcement registry! One is understandable and safe and beneficial and on and o the other ! HELL NO !
      I Will stop for now ! Thanks !

    • #34754 Reply
      Avatar
      Ray

      I am the offended offender , I walk 3 little girls to a school bus stop but I’m a registrant, I go to
      Many places and greet other people’s kids but I’m a registrant, little innocent girls come to play with my kids in my home and I trust myself to let them in and they are protected and safe just like my very own, but I’m a registrant , my neighbor is a child welfare officer and likely has no idea about my offense as his kids come over to play with my kids, but remind me, who is the registrant ? I go anywhere I please and I’m not treated like a disease because my face doesn’t show up or name on the registry , but yet I’m a registrant, you will never know unless I tell you, you will never think unless my actions outweigh my own moral compass, if I am who you think I am you are misguided and should something register in your mind you would be least offended by me . I’m a man a Simple normal man , that had a consensual friendship with a teen from the onset , that purported a false legal age at the height of near 6ft. I’m offended because I am wanting to know who I actually offended my own judgement or that of an innocent teen? Where is the ⚖️ Where did I go wrong in my life to feel lonely and seek form someone who was 14 vs my 33? I only meant to love not hurt . Pediophilia is not worth its own self -biting terminology when not many can clearly define its terms. The words systems and social classes we place on each other are nothing but one-upisms I challenge anyone who thinks I will hurt any child or cause myself to ever again be criminally convicted. Damn the dubbing and the way you think you can classify me. I live free and define me ! Registry is nothing but a ruse and convenient go-to for political popularity and expediency.

      • #35019 Reply
        Avatar
        Jonny everyman

        Spot on ray, thank you for sharing

    • #34800 Reply
      Avatar
      angry

      Hey Marci Hamilton! 17 children were killed two days ago by a non-registed sex offender never accused of sex crimes. So, how does your theory work? Have 17 children been killed this year by sex offenders or by sex crimes being committed?

      Marci Hamilton, is this how your platform is ‘protecting’ children?’ Marci Hamilton, if you really, really care about children you are not doing a good job. 17 were just killed.

      • #34879 Reply
        Avatar
        Maestro

        Marci doesn’t care about 17 dead kids, so long as they weren’t sexually “assaulted” before they were killed.

    • #36071 Reply
      Avatar
      Jay

      I was convicted in 2012 after a 2009 search warrant. I’m a recovering sex addict that after nearly a decade of porn, began viewing child porn. I was also a nurse and as such, sought out evidence based research on sex crimes, sex addiction and anything that remotely is associated to my addiction and crime. I found it sad that Marcie was unable to name the studies she referred to in nothing more than a general way. Where as Emily clearly identifies her sources. I’m grateful that small as it may seem, there is positive movement in SO laws. Marcie, to me was spewing fear and falsehoods that have lead us down a dangerous and unfair path of punishment for any sex offender. Should I have been punished for possessing child pornography? Yes! Should I be on lifetime supervision and 25 years registration? No.

      On another point. My state does treat sex offenders in prison and post release. Treatment that is evidence based and effective.

      Lastly, had I not pleaded guilty on two counts of possession of child pornography, I would have been tried on three counts of possessions and three counts of solicitation of a minor. I was looking at a minimum of 15 years with the possibility of 25. I was advised by an arbitration judge to take a plea of 42 months even though is was only guilty of the possession. He told me and my attorney that guilt didn’t matter. I can’t win in my state on either charge and even innocent, take the plea. Instead, my friends, family, therapists and the agency that did the sex offender evaluation begged the assistant district attorney to hear my story of addiction and as a result, I took a plea of 24 months and served 18 months. A fraction of the possible 15-25 years. At the beginning, my lawyer informed me that my case was not about right and wrong but politics and money. The tactic is pile on the charges and get a lesser plea. Having a high conviction rate is more important that serving justice. The ADA even told my attorney, he will go to prison, I can’t run for DA some day after letting a sex offend off the hook. Blind Justice. You decide for your self what that blindness means.

    • #36672 Reply
      Avatar
      rpsabq

      If these two women were talking about the same thing, it would have been an effective debate. We must remember to remind people that we already have a system for the worst case, predatory psychopaths whose sole focus is to rape and murder children. That’s not who Emily is talking about.

    • #37543 Reply
      Avatar
      John Pearlman

      America has the oldest age of consent.. 150 years ago 15 year olds were marrying and having babies.. I think the idea of consent needs to be rethought because yes is yes.. In a sober mind set.. And I don’t speak to rapist and child molester like with little kids.. But with a 15 year old who already had sex with a full T-shirt looking 20 with all her makeup say yes I wanna have sec.. She is in her right mind if there was no coercion

    • #48913 Reply
      Avatar
      Steve Jobs inc.

      Hello, to the very few that may pay attention… I have been dead for some time from cancer. Though i come to you into tthe future to bring a new lline to the debate at issue of the sex offender registry. Both sides have stired unproductive ways but only to gain access to the public to make an excuse to tweek it several more times but not to actually prevent pre-crime nor to prevent recidivism with a leading constitutional arguement. Well while on the brink of New World Order, population control, and increase of a civil collaps that Stephon Hawkings pursued to understood and explained in good detail to even the CIA and an international commity. So maybe to be analysed is how and what is needed to crontrol crime itself but also for all crime to bear a precrime control and preventative measures. Societal philosophy is of free speech but not free to actions that lead to crime. So for start i bring to you an idea that Apple inc. Has a up incoming I-Safe technology that is undetectable by the public but is only monitered by law inforcement task forces only. So there are free and safe energy technology like magnetics charging cell phones and micro like size GPS and Micro phone combo devices. These devices of such technology can be put in buttons, rings, eye glasses, contacts, injected intonthe body, in hair ties, ect. There is also in process soft wearfor concerned parents to use this technology to have with there childrens gear and can be monitered by the parents but always by the task forces. So we have been developing signs for predicting precrime on sex crimes as well and also developing artificial intelligences which like A.I. Sophia to help moniter with these precrime task forces in a wide spectrum . So with 5G Network developing this ISafe technology can be merely invisible to the public and can be in band width miles away from a tower linking to a celluar device automatically that is in distances of ten to fifety miles between ISafe technology and even a cellular phone. So in starts all criminals can be the use for this technology and with in a year we will have a full spectrum of control of precrime. So Aplle inc. would like to see tech buolders and designers compete for not just the best device but the best secure softwear available for the one world order and one world currency and laws. This will deminish crime and create a fair life style geared more for equality and less harm from one in person or even in a distance of say like cyber atrack or crime itself. So I am wanting to have this debate Dec.-24-2018 to start off and set future dates on better equality technology based on secure monitering and adjusting to precrime and consequences to prevent worse. Please email the Apple company custumer services to inquire in your offer of design of a technology and softwear format so before we put ours out sometime in 2019 that we adjust to the publics design and offers and the top three best will have a large offer of electronic secured money with CRED. Please place your name on a public vote and subscriptionto watch the debate. It is $5.00 to watch the debates each time and with your correct name and information you will be give gift offers for the opening to this upcoming society technology. Thankyou for reading and we in the Apple inc. will be happy to have you care for your community and future childrens upbringing and surroundings in society.

      Sincerely your past developer;
      Steve Jobs
      And APPLE Inc.

Viewing 9 reply threads
Reply To: Watch Debate – Should the Sex Offender Registry be Abolished?
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

  • *DO NOT POST LINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES
Your information:





<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">