Recidivism: the great lie of “frightening and high”

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #33080 Reply
      Sandy Rozek
      Sandy Rozek
      Admin

        By Derek Logue . . . “In so many instances these individuals should never ever be allowed out for a second chance, they’re ticking time bombs,
      [See the full post at: Recidivism: the great lie of “frightening and high”]

    • #33193 Reply
      Avatar
      Seti IIII

      A few of questions for Mr. Logue: 1) Why do you think proponents of sex offender (SO) laws, e.g., Supreme Court Justice Kennedy, keep spouting this “Frightening and High” recidivism LIE despite more than 20 years of empirical evidence showing the opposite? Study after study after study by some of the most respected research scientist in the country, e.g., professor Mark Ellman, professor Jill Levenson, and others have proved this contention to be a LIE; however, proponents of SO laws seem to just overlook these studies. And 2) Do proponents of SO laws have their own studies made by other respected research scientist that dispute those studies that conclude no high recidivism rate? 3) If so, can you point me to those studies? I am real interested to see for myself the proof proponents have that supports their position. Thank you very much.

      • #60106 Reply
        Avatar
        Marvin Bair

        I think it to be complete ignorance to make such a comment when only 3.5 % of sex offenders commit further crimes, and most of them are theft crimes due to ex offenders trying to feed themselves in a society where it is made impossible for them to survive. People like you need to get your heads out of your asses and look up the facts rather than spreading more rumors and lies !

    • #33274 Reply
      Avatar
      D

      Can we all do a class action law suite against this senator for defamation of character then? I mean it can be proven that it is not true so it is in fact defamation of character.

    • #34814 Reply
      Avatar
      aurelius

      I wonder if this pie chart takes into account some states that consider any little violation of the registry as a “new” “sex offense”

Viewing 3 reply threads
Reply To: Recidivism: the great lie of “frightening and high”
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

  • *DO NOT POST LINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES
Your information:





<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">