- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 6 days, 9 hours ago by admin.
June 25, 2020 at 4:42 pm #73822
By Timothy Eggert . . . The state’s criminal code completely bars child sex offenders from entering public parks, despite an exception written into a
[See the full post at: NARSOL E.D. quoted in Chicago Daily Law Bulletin]
June 26, 2020 at 5:32 am #73825
This just further proves the registry exists solely as a blank check for the state or federal government to harass and re-incarcerate persons forced to register at their whim because they were never wanted back out in free society to begin with. It’s total garbage and the judges who upheld the man’s convictions knew the whole case was bogus to start with. The court just said this man has no right as a parent to retrieve a disobedient minor child and bring him or her home if they happen to be in a park. This tramples all over a parent’s basic right to raise their child. This case should be ripe for appeal to hopefully a more honest court.
I doubt legislators will do a blasted thing because the law is exactly what they want it to be; a legal minefield of little “gotchas” that can put one in jail or prison for years on the flimsiest of pretexts.
June 26, 2020 at 1:41 pm #73839
Tim in WI
Getting some pub!
I’m wondering what would happen if a group of NARSOL advocates occupied the same Illinois park at issue here. What happens if out of state registrants and advocates assemble and use the park in an effort to confront the intent of the law.
I happen to live in Rock County WI, which borders Winnebago County, IL and I’ve kin who live just across the border. It is time to confront the electronic police state.
June 27, 2020 at 1:38 pm #73857
Tim in WI,
I wonder that too.
I am also of the opinion that, as our numbers grow, and as this systemic persecution becomes more egregious, there are going to be louder and louder calls for the type of action you are endorsing – sit-in protests.
I understand that you have not mentioned violence in your post – simply peaceful demonstration.
But I also believe (for good or bad) that some sort of armed confrontation(s) is (are) inevitable at some point in the future.
I believe that there may be martyrs.
Maybe this seems like an extreme viewpoint.
But I am not (in this post) expressing either approval or disapproval of such actions – only that I believe that they will happen in the future. (Nor am I encouraging such actions.)
But I believe that the voices of dissent will get louder, and tensions will grow.
June 27, 2020 at 2:02 pm #73868
When I see the term Public Parks, I think they should clearly separate out public parks in the area that has playgrounds . I believe that national public parks should definitely not be lumped into this. Also public parks offer facilities that are for adults such as tennis, adult pools, pickleball, and exercise rooms that require ages 18 and up.
Not a very realistic approach
June 27, 2020 at 2:12 pm #73875
Well I have thought about this type of sit in or action myself here in MN. With all the places we as registered persons can not go or enjoy I think it would be interesting to see the response to such an action. I understand that it could end up being more of a confrontation of both sides and think that it would cause more harm then good at this stage of the fight.
June 27, 2020 at 2:13 pm #73876
I agree with this as using the term public park you are lumping in all parks (state, Federal, and evening private parks that are open to the public could even be included) there needs to be specific information on this and better written laws. Too many states have just rushed to pass laws that do little to actually protect those it was written to protect. I don’t see laws written keeping burglars from the business district or private homes. Or car thrives from cars. In fact I know of a person who is a locksmith with a burglary charge. How does that work.
June 27, 2020 at 6:29 pm #73883
Of course, you had to know this was only a gateway into the eventual control of all people [“First they came for the Communists…”] by targeting ‘low hanging fruit.’ Now, all are being made to wear the “Mask of the Beast.” This is just the nature of the flesh raging and rebelling against its Creator. “In this world, ye shall have tribulation: But be of good cheer; I have overcome the world.”
June 28, 2020 at 7:35 am #73902
Tim in WI
Well you mean because there are no signs that say ” No Negros” it’s not intended as unreasonable affirmative restraint? Offenders dont protest because they’re afraid to do so.
June 28, 2020 at 7:36 am #73901
Tim in WI
How very ecclesiastical of you to say that. The database machine driven infrastructure certainly exploits certain inherent sinful nature in human.
Grisly as it is, there is no end to the evil potential and consequences especially with concern to an individuals’ liberty. War mongers will exploit It to the fullest.
It does so by the same ways and means state sponsored lottery drawings do.
Illinois has particularly latched on to taxing the gambling industry and a per-machine basis%. Small machine gambling establishments popped up everywhere.
Gov capitalizing on gambling addictions of residents. Like pine marten to feathered snare.
June 28, 2020 at 7:39 am #73896
Revolt, of some type, is Inevitable.
June 29, 2020 at 2:51 pm #73933
As soon as a previously convicted CSO enters a park he or she ‘BECOMES’ DANGEROUS?
Outside the Park the CSO is ‘NO LONGER’ DANGEROUS?
What sense does that make?