The National Association for Rational Sexual Offense Laws (NARSOL) is pleased to announce that registration for the 11th national conference is offici [See the full post at: NARSOL 2019 conference in Houston, TX]
Just found out that Washington state ISRB is sidestepping the 7th circuit decision on pornography by instead stating, in a supremely vague way, “possessing or viewing anything of a sexual nature”! Because the ISRB answers to no one, they have imposed this without any oversight. It is so vague that virtually anything, from a friends bikini picture, to a cartoon image could be cause for violation. Coupled with MANDATORY polygraph tests to ensure “compliance”.
Looking for an attorney in the Seattle area to combat this. Any suggestions?