- This topic has 7 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 year, 1 month ago by Elaine.
March 26, 2019 at 4:40 pm #53861
By John R. Ellement . . . Convicted sex offenders retain a constitutional right to privacy, and those rights are being violated by a state law mandati
[See the full post at: MA Supreme Judicial Court rules no on mandatory, blanket GPS monitoring]
March 27, 2019 at 8:18 am #53864
Everything will end up back to square 1 which is …it is and always has been illegal and unjust to not provide correct procedure and due process for each and every crime and the excessive use of plea deals and poor oversight of defense, do to widespread bias in consideration of type of crimes…i.e. sexual nature but not necessarily the seriousness or mitigation, litigation basis also the denial of proper review by professionals..on last point on the unconstutionality of specific concentration of laws both intrusive and punitive as well as binding and violating Civil codes and statute’s !!!
March 28, 2019 at 8:32 am #53875
This is the second state supreme court to recently decide aspects of GPS monitoring to be unconstitutional. Baby steps, but it is movement. I see as most encouraging the requirement for “individualized determinations of reasonableness.” Most SO regulations involve absurd blanket applications. Requiring courts to justify individual restrictions will provide new avenues for appeal, and will further burden an already overloaded system. For economic reasons alone, legislatures may ease some odious requirements.
March 28, 2019 at 8:32 am #53890
Abolish GPS PERMANENTLY, does not protect society at all! It is a tool to call a person an animal on a leash! Not to mention a money making gimmick for Manufacturing companies.
March 31, 2019 at 5:13 am #54024
Behold the power of databases.
Continuing electronic search by gov agents is a reality. Private firms also capitalize from legal subservience of human to ” the people’s ” machines that impact liberty via the imposition of affirmative restraint. Are we at our base a nation of, for, by machines to impose social order? Yes, undoubtedly the electronic blacklists will expand and ultimately prevail for political control.
FISA malpractice has already reared its inevitable potential since the Patriot Acts inception. Facebook is now being sued by the Feds for biased protocol but that same fed promoted banning registrants. Who to trust?
April 12, 2019 at 2:39 pm #54398
I live in Massachusetts and am on probation and have the gps put on because it was required by law even though my cases dates back to 1995 !
Yet they have not made any moves to take these gps bracelet off. You have to hire a lawyer and have them file a motion and then it’s up to the judge but I don’t have any money to hire a lawyer right now so It stays!!
May 20, 2019 at 9:01 pm #56010
I am in South Carolina and we have the same issue. Been on GPS for nine years for a conviction that has now been expunged off record. In order to get it taken off you have to file a motion and let a judge decide Even though everyone assumed an expungement would take care of this. I don’t believe GPS protects anybody because if a person wants to commit a crime they can still do it. To me it is cruel and unusual punishment for someone who is already completed their sentence and is no longer on probation. South Carolina made a huge mistake when they wrote and rewrote over and over again the statute for the GPS requirement And sex offender registry. There are hundreds of gaps that I have already pointed out to the legislature, governor, senator, any representative that has to do with passing laws or creating them . And guess what they don’t give a damn because it doesn’t pertain to them or any of their loved ones.
May 3, 2019 at 7:13 am #55258
Hang in there. We are making Progress.