- This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 3 weeks, 3 days ago by admin.
March 25, 2021 at 12:13 pm #82381
The Free Press, Mankato, Minn. Patty Wetterling lost a son to the actions of a sex offender. But she now has misgivings about a sex offender registry
[See the full post at: Jacob Wetterling’s mother urges reforming the registry]
March 25, 2021 at 1:53 pm #82385
A Mistake They Made
There is an honest lady. Bless you!
March 26, 2021 at 8:16 am #82393
Tim in WI
Her poor chld was kidnapped from a small group walking around without adult supervision. Why none of the others protested Jacob leaving the group is beyond me. Obviously none of them were familiar with the perp yet trusting jacob went along while the others returned home. Something about his story doesn’t piece together completely despite press reports. Some reports deny to sexual component while others make a second hand tie whereby another person claimed attack by the same guy, but little evidence to it was produced. Meanwhile Ms. Whetterling is left to just wonder and regret. A nightmarish path to be sure. What mother wouldn’t cry out for an ounce of prevention?
Enter the religious reliance upon the database to fix social ill. Yea! That’ll fix it.
Oops, guess not. Who protects our children from it? By selecting for unfettered and unconstitutional use of it they exponentially increased the threat to humanity from the people’s use. When machine value outweighs human value. Free men are paid to maintain property or do so by the own volition. All else or any other alternative disposition is plain slavery.
March 26, 2021 at 11:39 pm #82416
“ The man who 27 years later admitted to Jacob’s abduction and killing would not have actually been on such a registry because he’d never been charged or convicted of a sex crime.”
And that’s where she went wrong. This is where they ALL go wrong. The lawmakers make sure to keep it hidden that the perpetrator had no prior record. Much like the nanny who molested Lauren Book in FL.
The more the legislature can keep the public thinking that a person is BORN with their criminal record, the more they can fear monger for their voter base.
March 29, 2021 at 5:53 pm #82492
Tim in WI
Right, But head over to Wikipedia and you’ll read about a second hand tie to molestation on the basis of another kids report presumably of the same guy.
Like you say, it is only anecdotally tied to the necessities of registration. Jabob’s case proves to much with respect to how easily fear based reaction can be used toward propaganda campaigns and hidden agendas of unfettered use of machine database. Obviously the thing was and is helpful but opting to enslavement spells the end to a human republic.
April 3, 2021 at 5:54 am #82619
H n H
“Obviously the thing was and is helpful but…..”
Exactly how, and in what way is it obvious that any aspect of the registry ever was or is helpful?
March 28, 2021 at 5:43 pm #82444
Everyone acts like the sex offender registery started out with good intentions. But that’s crap. There is no go to come when you serve a life sentence. Especially when it’s a lie. There are people on the registry that never done anything to be there but that doesn’t matter. Does it. We still get punished why. Politics
March 29, 2021 at 6:59 am #82464
All laws should be rational laws PERIOD. But SO laws went leaps and bounds beyond. And it’s always about these poster stories that everyone right up the chain at the DoJ chose to manipulate for THEIR gain. They made an impossible system…impossible to navigate, impossible to reform. Nobody wants to step-up but that’s what it’s going to take, everyone everywhere picking themselves up by the bootstraps and tackling this giant green blob.
If you’re alive you need to be in the fight.
April 3, 2021 at 11:36 am #82626
Its all about the money!!!
April 8, 2021 at 7:56 am #82702
It’s not just youth that should stay off of it. It has become worthless SPAM that provides very little protection and only serves to limit job prospects for offenders – some of which urinated in public as adults (not just kids). It should be limited to only violent sexual offenders, and that should not include those that perform unforced sodomy in states that are unfriendly to the LGQT public. It should also not include cases of statutory laws being invoked when otherwise situations would be considered consensual and not coerced.
The registry also prevents those labelled as victims but do not consider themselves victims from either seeking counseling to understand why they are labelled as such, or speaking out against being labelled as such. They may be afraid of causing harm to someone they have feelings for. So they are cut off from possible healing, sometimes into adult-hood for cases there is no statute of limitations. You don’t think a so-called victim would protect someone they feel they had consensual sex with from harm? Think again.
April 10, 2021 at 5:42 pm #82755
Mrs Wetterling is just as much a pawn of the state as Mrs Kanka.
Their horrible experiences were used to push legislation that was PRIMARILY intended for easy money and easy votes. What politician is going to defend registrants? It would end their career.
The witch hunting never ended.
I feel bad for what happened to Mrs Wetterling and Mrs Kanka. I feel even worse knowing that slimy politicians (many of whom have MASSIVE amounts of skeletons in their OWN closets) are using them for personal, financial, and political gain.
As long as there’s cash to be had in it – and as long as people remain ignorant due to propaganda – the registry will continue to exist as it always has: unconstitutional and shameful. Everyone is lumped in together, and the propaganda is as prevalent as ever, because it makes money and takes the attention off the REAL criminals : politicians.