Is S.C. Supreme Court right? NO! says NARSOL’s E.D. Brenda Jones

Viewing 8 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #7996 Reply
      Avatar
      admin

      By Gregory Yee…. Last week’s S.C. Supreme Court ruling that juveniles convicted of certain sex crimes must be registered for life on the state’s sex
      [See the full post at: Is S.C. Supreme Court right? NO! says NARSOL’s E.D. Brenda Jones]

    • #7997 Reply
      Avatar
      Solicitor needs to shade himself under a palmetto leaf

      I hope this gets appealed to the next level. This is not a literal death sentence, but it is a virtual one for this teen by what SCSC thinks. Throwing the baby out with the bath water. Who does the solicitor think he is saying the teen is beyond being able to be rehabilitated? Of course, Solicitors are elected officials, so it makes sense to pander to the pubic.

      The youngster who was on the receiving end of this from the teen will be able to move on with their life with the right support, help and knowledge and avoid the perpetual victim label should they chose to.

      S. Carolina, Bible Belt, hypocrites? Makes you think so about the Palmetto State…

    • #7998 Reply
      Avatar
      david

      Wow…..Because how people behave at 14 is so indicative of how they will behave the rest of their lives.

      And the tired excuse “it’s for the public safety” isn’t fooling anyone. Show us the data proving registries have made society safer. If 95% of new sex crimes are committed by first time offenders (not on the registry) then the registry is hardly doing what it’s supposed to.

      Keep the registry private- for law enforcement only. If a judge ordered someone to stand on a busy street corner wearing a sign that said “i’m a sex offender” for the rest of their lives, that would be cruel and unusual, no? Putting someone on the public registry for life is essentially the same thing. How horrible that must feel for a young person to realize they will never have a normal life.

    • #7999 Reply
      Avatar
      Maestro

      “Prosecutors applauded the ruling, saying that some young offenders are beyond rehabilitation and need to be monitored..”

      Until the day one of THEIR juvenile (or even adult) kids commits a sex offense.
      Anyone remember the prosecutor whose son got caught up in a sting on “To Catch A Predator”? She quickly went from wanting to send everyone to prison to trying to defend her son in front of the very same court where she tries to send everyone to prison. Hypocritical.

      People who become prosecutors must have been bullied back in school.

    • #8000 Reply
      Avatar
      admin

      Probably not so much hypocritical as just what it takes to see the abuses in the system. How many of us would be on the ‘side’ we are on if we hadn’t become embroiled in it either personally or through someone we know or love? Before that happened, if someone had asked you if you favored laws that were tougher on criminals or laws that made it easier on criminals, what would you have said? Be honest.

    • #8001 Reply
      Avatar
      Registry Rage

      “This is a message to everybody that we’re not going to tolerate crimes against children.”

      And therein lies the Freudian slip! It’s about retaliatory vengeance and punitive “get even” punishment, NOT “justice.”

      They really do need to stop playing the “children in constant peril” card.

    • #8002 Reply
      Avatar
      Maestro

      Sandy,

      It’s actually a difficult decision. Let me first pretend I’m a prosecutor or law maker so I can get inside their minds…..

      “We need to get tougher on crime and criminals! Send these bastards away for a long time, followed by years of supervision and outcasting from society. They must never lead a normal life again. Forgiveness is NOT an option.
      Besides, none of OUR loved ones or even ourselves will ever commit these horrible acts so we need not worry.”

      How’s that?

    • #8003 Reply
      Avatar
      Maestro

      David,

      Trust, it’s fooling enough people that their laws/rules towards us are getting them elected.

    • #8004 Reply
      Avatar
      Dan South

      It’s all about the $$$$$
      And the piece of shit attorneys Love It.
      They won’t fight against registration, IT’S THEIR LIVELIHOOD.

Viewing 8 reply threads
Reply To: Reply #8000 in Is S.C. Supreme Court right? NO! says NARSOL’s E.D. Brenda Jones
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

  • *DO NOT POST LINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES
Your information:





<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">

Cancel