Fourth Circuit to NC: Got some statistical evidence? Anything? Hello? You there?

Viewing 12 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #8836 Reply
      Avatar
      NARSOL
      Admin

      By David Post . . . In an important decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit on Wednesday struck down [Doe v. Cooper — opinion posted h
      [See the full post at: Fourth Circuit to NC: Got some statistical evidence? Anything? Hello? You there?]

    • #8837 Reply
      Avatar
      Empirical Evidence specificity is next

      In fact, the Court strongly rejected the assertions of the State of North Carolina that anecdotes, common sense and logic could replace empirical evidence. Based upon this statement alone, Research Triangle in NC should be coughing on what the state thought considering they produce empirical evidence using scientific methods to defeat what is thought of as anecdotes, common sense and logic. (The Research Triangle, commonly referred to as simply The Triangle, is a region in the Piedmont of North Carolina in the United States, anchored by North Carolina State University, Duke University, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and the cities of Raleigh and Durham and the town of Chapel Hill. Wikipedia.)

      Research = Empirical evidence (aka statistical data)

      Next step, provide what are truly worthy empirical evidence generating research methods, e.g. NOT Static-99 solely.

    • #8838 Reply
      Avatar
      Carl

      So please forgive my ignorance but what does all this mean for sex offenders? Are they going to have to change any law’s? Could some make all this easier to understand.

    • #8839 Reply
      Avatar
      Erika

      Just wanted to clarify my comment about a “Self-ful-filling Prophecy[1]” because I feel that I’m leaving the reader hanging out in space.

      What I mean is that well intentioned politicians/ lawmakers will refuse to accept or even observe the hard cross-validated data simply for political or animosity reasoning but little does he or she realize they are creating great harm on both sides of the fence by increasing the recidivism rates through socially isolating the targets by creating an inescapable panoptic prison to test ones sanity and cause the very thing the law was intended to prevent in addition to harming the present or future children of registrants.

      [1] In his 1948 article Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, Merton defines it in the following terms:

      The self-fulfilling prophecy is, in the beginning, a false definition of the situation evoking a new behavior which makes the original false conception come true. This specious validity of the self-fulfilling prophecy perpetuates a reign of error. For the prophet will cite the actual course of events as proof that he was right from the very beginning.

    • #8840 Reply
      Avatar
      Rajendra

      when will the registry end and all the draconian laws surrounding it?
      I took plea for lower class felony but then they added five years of supervision even though the verdict was the time served. It doesn’t make any sense at all! They don’t allow for international travel and there’s so many restrictions.

    • #8841 Reply
      Avatar
      In Search of Liberty

      Thank you 4th Circuit Court of Appeals for not allowing “Bald Assertions” to replace evidence in a court of law and especially, especially, in the making of law by state legislatures. I read the court’s opinion in this case and I was very, very impressed with the court’s reasoning, its discernment AND analysis of the issues at hand and really impressed with the court’s eloquence. I think I like this court’s eloquence little better then Judge Batchelder’s from the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in Does v. Snyder out of Michigan. I mean the 4th Circuit really broke down NC’s sex offender statutes into little pieces and showed how they did not pass constitutional muster. They did a great job with that.

    • #8842 Reply
      Avatar
      Aaron

      Does this mean the residency rules are back to 300 feet or still 1000 feet. The politicians know this is a winning topic to keep punishing sex offenders and it gets them elected.

    • #8843 Reply
      Avatar
      James Townsend

      Well I met with my probation officer today and I’m going back to court. We discussesd all of what was going on I even showed him this site and he said I wasn’t suppose to actually be on it. I was only suppose to be on the internet for my business since I do graphic work and ceramic tile work.
      I guess this is another challenge that I have to go thru. It seems they want all sex offenders to be in the dark about their offense.
      I would suggest everybody on here write an article and send it or get your editor of your newspaper to publish something as I think its time now for the American public to know just whats going on this wizard of oZZ thing or hype of all this scheme..
      How unconstitutional it is for all states. I even mentioned to my PO about freedom of speech and this Doe Vs Cooper and he tried to look it up on his phone but didn’t know to much about it but all if this is going to come down the pike soon.
      Believe it or not I don’t even thing one can type in their browser ‘sex offender laws or look up anything about sex offenders when the main thing is they want one to stay away from kids.
      One more example…. from time to time I will get e-mails from some person on yahoo looking for a good time…… of course that is a set up and a ruse I expect. If they do tricks than why not entice someone with a fake e-mail which could turn out to be a cop. I wouldn’t put anything past a cop.

    • #8844 Reply
      Avatar
      Speaking of laws…..

      If memory serves me correctly I believe all of the designers of these ridiculous laws, statues and ordinances took an oath to protect the Constitution of the United States. Where is the non-partisan, politically-free and un-opinionated judicial review of these blatantly unconstitutional laws BEFORE it sees the light of day? All of this needless personal damage and waste of taxpayer monies (YOUR MONEY) could be averted by simply instituting a comprehensive judicial review board that carefully scrutinizes any piece of legislature that even hints at reducing personal inalienable rights. This board should be free from ANY outside influence of a political nature. They should be the ones who can legally stand up and say, “Hey guess what? YOU CAN’T DO THAT!” If there is an argument to be made for or against a proposed law then it should happen logically, BEFORE IT IS SUBMITTED FOR SIGNATURES. I’ve got an idea. Why don’t we propose our own legislation and do just that. I bet we could get over 850,000 signatures…….

    • #8845 Reply
      Avatar
      James Townsend

      Fourth Circuit to NC. Got some statistical evidence? Anything Hello? Are you there? I have to hand it to Brenda and her crew. This news came at a crucial time in my ordeal as well as others.

      Now put on your ethical thinking cap. Here goes…Martyr…a person who is killed because of his religion or other belief’s.

      Now in a lot of these ordeals of an internet scheme they wanted us to belief that they were teenagers. Now how can one believe something unless one gets proof to that encounter?
      All of us make mistakes but we as a sex offender seem to be in a class of outcasts. Sure I have argued with my sister about this and I’m sure a lot of others have argued with family members but unless one in in there shoe’s they really don’t understand.
      Heck I wouldn’t mind going 6 months drunk driving that this? But what after probation does anyone have to look for? I think its high time we all stand up. As I told my PO there are over 8 hundred thousand people on the registry and he agreed to that figured. That is a lot of human lives being wasted because of some cop wanted to practice at the art of deception.
      Here is an article you all might want to look up to get a better refresher on all this police and interrogation methods..http://caught.net/prose/police.htm

    • #8846 Reply
      Avatar
      Ron

      In my case upon completion of incarceration, the DOC attempted to Petetion the court without my appearance ,while locked up to add a year on to my supervision, the judge denied their request and let the three years stand. Ten years later I was discharged from registering. I have a great argument to nullify the firearms felon restriction.
      After release or was sent from my civilian institution back on duty in the military. I demonstrated my lawful abiding proof that I could be trusted to carry and did, in combat and domeatically. Now for a court to mute my argument would be cumbersome and hard even though my state explicitly bans sex offender restoration, but protects every other post-felon class. It is a strange up on the ante when the class of sex offender is not often comenstruated by tool of force and intimidation. It’s nothing but a personable crush of the nuts of someone so aggrieved in the boughs of lustful legislative chambers plotting on every potential or prospecting pervert. I can see right through these bull snot bureaucrats. Sad dam ass shame!

    • #8847 Reply
      Avatar
      Maestro

      James Townsend,

      Don’t read too much into those random emails looking for a good time. Everyone gets those. They are “click-bait” for morons who will open the emails, click the links and have a crap ton of viruses and malware attach to their computers for thieves to break into all your person stuff (i.e. bank accounts, etc) and bleed you dry.
      I can’t begin to tell you how many emails per day I get with headings that read: “V I A G R A from Canada at low prices”, “Hi, remember me? We chatted before” and “FREE pharmacy medicines”.
      There is a sucker born every minute who will click these messages and get scammed.

    • #8848 Reply
      Avatar
      James Townsend

      Ah Mr. Maestro. I do remember litter Richard with the fake eye lashes and the long hair and I do remember “Captain Jack will get you high tonight” I believe that was Bennie and the Jets so who was abusing and who was real?

      Now one has to understand that Police are servants of God or Ministers of God if you might say. God is not the author of Confusion.. Now abuse comes in many different forms. So what is vague in your standards or should one give an opportunity if they are representatives of God?

      Now for the 64 thousand dollar question. While my PO might not approve me of being on RSOL it is what it is until it, ain’t want it is?

      And yes there is a sucker born every minute but if you have knowledge, wisdom, and understanding and a little bit of mustard seed faith one can see miracles happen. Answer me this. …. is there no redemption of the sex offender or is it a one shot charley type of abuse?

      RSOL since I have been on it has different people on here with different backgrounds of offenses but RSOL is here to help inform each other that reaches out to this and also gives the opportunities to understand more about the sex offender plight and what they as a group can do to help others.

      Isn’t that what its all about helping others? And when one is helping others that’s a God sent.

Viewing 12 reply threads
Reply To: Fourth Circuit to NC: Got some statistical evidence? Anything? Hello? You there?
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

  • *DO NOT POST LINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES
Your information:





<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">