- This topic has 13 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 3 years, 5 months ago by Saddles.
October 23, 2017 at 9:33 am #25114
By Sandy… Three years ago, a spokesperson for NARSOL, then RSOL, was interviewed for an article about a young man named Guy Hamilton-Smith. In 2011
[See the full post at: For a registered sex offender, how much rehabilitation is enough?]
October 23, 2017 at 10:26 am #25121
This is just another example of who makes the rules. Here is someone who has princes themselves and is trying to help. I pray for you for strength, courage and safety.
October 24, 2017 at 2:40 pm #25281
It would be an interesting and challanging thing to find out, but I wonder just how many closet pedophiles are in Congress, or for that matter all politics and position of power, including the Supreme court justices. Back when I was younger when gays and lesbians were struggling with their identities and rights, were bullied and harrassed and a very wise friend of mine made an extremely crazy comment to me. He said,” chances are that many of those persecuting gays and lesbians are most likely gay themselves but cant admit or come to terms with themselves. Get my meaning?
October 23, 2017 at 10:29 am #25126
So I would have to ask… what the heck does being on the registry have to do with being a lawyer???
You did the work, you should be able to reap the rewards. What a f***d up system
October 23, 2017 at 11:28 pm #25199
Their probably afraid he will help people for less if you know what I mean, I hope some day when he’s off the registry he gets to finish his bar and puts it to these people.
Hell he could be his own attorney.
October 23, 2017 at 11:28 pm #25201
I myself liked the article and one has to wonder and use common sense for a minute. Yes, I’m sure it was good correction but than one has to say. Who allowed porn in the USA in the first. I believe it was the good ole USA with the tax they could make off of this industry. Whether porn is legal or not I just don’t know but its still a bad thing to do and some get hooked up on it.
Sometimes we all have to reach out for help but denying this person to take the bar exam is a bit underhanded if you ask me.
October 24, 2017 at 10:55 am #25240
My middle initials are, D.A.. I can relate to your desire to be admitted to the bar. It was my late grandfathers wish that I ended up an attorney. Unfortunately, it didn’t happen. I was derailed by an accusation of child molestation on my birthday in 1991. To make a long story shorter, in one fell swoop the state of Wisconsin made me a felon and SO in the spring of 92. I know I was not guilty AND I believe I can prove it.! What I did not know then was the states do not need evidence to convict. A single accusation is enough.
Our legal system has done this to hundreds maybe thousands of people. What I can not figure is why? Who benefits from this making felons out of those who are not?
Of particular interest here on the NARSOL site is the ban on FB use. I think it curious that the ban occurred AFTER a man was able to prove his innocence via FB. His accuser admitted in a chat room that she complained in order to get money via law suit from the school which she attended with the man she accused. It worked too!
I believe the same people who benefit from wrongful felonization are behind the FB ban. It is a way of covering their backsides. We see the same behavior when wrongfully convicted individuals attempt to clear their name. The DAs fight them every step of the way even when DNA points to another person. I have had many a conversation with attorneys dealing with wrongful conviction just to figure out what to do about it. Unfortunately, my case falls to the bottom if the priority list, because I am not in prison as many wrongfully convicted are.
Never the less, I find myself on the WISORNA list today and suffer the same restrictions and indignities. Like it or not I am on it. Twice I have confronted the system by demanding trial for failure to register. I am 1-1. Truth telling to power is never easy but I will attempt to again soon.
Would you be interested in playing a role in such an endeavour? If so feel free to respond here. I have nothing to hide AMA! Maybe we can help some others along the way.
October 24, 2017 at 2:40 pm #25282
I have recently been released from prison after doing 12 years of a 15-year sentence. I expected that parole may be challenging, but had no idea of the real magnitude. I left the system as a ZERO. That is the number that the system placed on my chances of recidivism after completing a 9-month treatment program. Even though the therapists inside the system placed such a low risk in my file, the parole board sent me out on a Super Intensive Supervised Parole ( known here in Texas as SISP). The new restrictions have made any type of normal life absolutely impossible, not just for, but even for the person that allows me to stay in her home. Schedules need to be made up weeks in advance, including the stop, their phone number, and address. Who knows 3 three weeks in advance the exact moment that they’ll need fuel? Or the phone number of that fuel station. I’m out 6 weeks now and still haven’t got a driver’s license. Not because I haven’t tried, but because little things happen, like the film being offline at the DPS office. That pushed me back two weeks because of scheduling. Normally, you or any other individual would have just gone back the next day. Does somebody want to talk about frustrating?
October 24, 2017 at 9:58 pm #25308
Rehabilitation, That in itself is a good question. I would suppose it would depend on the instructor, the probation officer, and the district attorney, but in the end there is always a rebuttal effect tied to it. Even after a probation or a jail sentence the authorities can come back and say, in their opinion, that the person needs more supervision thus life long controlling factors as most of these sex offense situations’ go.
Sure I wish that anyone that had a sex conviction does their time or probation and never does something like that again but it does happen.
That doesn’t look good for those that are trying to get off of the registry. Its sort of mixed and even with this fellow in Virginia that the governor restored his rights it appears to put a damper on the circumstances we all are prone to at this time. Its all about honesty.. If the PO and others say we feel you don’t need rehabilitation than that should be it., but considering all factors they will even have a way of twisting that also.
October 26, 2017 at 11:08 am #25498
What other professions are Registrants barred from? I could see if one applied for a high school girls swim coach position- but why not practice law?
IMO, possessing illegal pornography should be treated more as a mental health issue and less of a criminal matter. Seems insane to put people in prison for years for looking at pictures. Why not do the same for those who view any violent images?
This sex hysteria reminds me of the failed War on Drugs. Going after the consumers of contraband does nothing to stop the consumption and we only end up with more people in prisons.
Congratulations Guy for sharing your inspiring story!
October 26, 2017 at 12:18 pm #25515
Why not challenge the sex offender registry itself as being unconstitutional and along with “supervised release”? They are both punishment after someone has served his/her sentence.
October 31, 2017 at 11:43 am #25846
The supreme court deemed it regulatory and not punitive where have you been?
October 27, 2017 at 10:59 pm #25605
For me, up until my arrest and coerced wrongful conviction, the words “child” and “Porn” always had an oxymoronic correlation. I’m an old man who has spent his life in the arts. Anyone so absorbed also has an inordinate interest in trying to understand the human condition, and especially the bizarre extremes of that condition, is bound sooner or later to accidentally cross the line into illegality. In my case, I was stunned to discover in the manner I did that Journalistic Curiousity could now be considered a heinous crime. After four published novels in the last century, two produced plays, and over 250 written broadcast television documentaries that are still airing both overseas and here on a lot of the Discovery line-up of channels, I found what I thought was a worthwhile subject for a television special on societal witch hunts and wars on sex and sexual expression.
I discovered that the more things have changed since the 17th century, the more they have stayed the same. I also, to my shame, must admit that I had not kept up on changes in the Federal laws or what passes for justice in the courts.
For a refreshing view of sanity on this subject I offer up at the following in cutting edge research science three papers put out by Dr. Melissa Hamilton, one of the giant intellects of our movement at the following addresses: (http://ssm.com/abstract=1580016) Public Safety, Individual Liberty, and Suspect science: Future Dangerousness Assessments and Sex Offender laws; (http://ssm.com/abstract=1914496) The Child Pornography Crusade and its Net Widening Effect; (http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr/vol33/iss2/2) Adjudicating Sex Crimes as Mental Disease.
How much rehab is enough? Check these out if you really want to know.
November 11, 2017 at 1:01 am #26919
How much rehabilitation is enough. Sure we all should ponder on that one. We should also ponder on protecting and serving and truth. Now the law was made for” Truth’ and those in the truth should abide with the truth. Sure I agree that their shouldn’t be any sexual porn or anything like that to entice others but the true answers are two wrongs don’t make a right.
I’m sure everybody is curious as to all this sex offense ordeal and how to explain it away but are all not carnal by nature. Doesn’t the bible say try the spirit?
Remember says their is not a just man upon the face of the earth that doeth good and sinnith not. Protecting is good but it is the way one goes about protecting.
Yes we all on here want to reason this all out and I hate to mention it does bring shame to everyone of us. It also brings guilt to the one’s that set up these operations.
Jesus was never undercover for anything or even with his disciples. Today it seems a lot of these sex stings are out of line in a lot of ways.
Were the Pharisees out of line in a lot of ways. Protecting and serving is good but when it goes against the God’s law than who’s at who’s mercy. How can someone defend one and set one up at the same time. Doesn’t one understand that God’s justice is the best way. Now protecting is good but common sense is a bit better. Even truth and justice for all can go a bit wacko if your not learning the bible and growing I believe everybody should refresh themselves of to the inscription that is on the liberty bell.
Truth and justice is always the best way.