Florida’s artificially inflated sexual offense registry: More federal funds for the state?

Viewing 11 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #52778 Reply
      Avatar
      admin

      By Steve Yoder . . . It was the kind of headline guaranteed to generate clicks even over the winter holidays and amid a federal government shutdown: “
      [See the full post at: Florida’s artificially inflated sexual offense registry: More federal funds for the state?]

    • #52782 Reply
      Avatar
      Kev

      Sounds like every RSO needs to visit Florida and “register”. Would be funny to overload the system and make Florida report a 10,000 % increase. Morons.

      • #52799 Reply
        Avatar
        citizen

        That really is a good idea. We don’t all need to do it at once. just do it within a few years….

        • #52979 Reply
          Avatar
          Mike

          DO NOT DO THAT!

          Florida is the most dangerous state for a Registered Citizen. Both the legislative and judicial branch have been corrupt for decades. The SORNA scheme is the most noticeable because humans are forced to physically live on the streets due to the residency laws in place.

          Florida must be investigated for “fraud”. The investigation must come from the Federal Government as Florida will not be honest or truthful in the oversight of itself, as corruption runs rampant in this southern state.

          Be very wise a stay away from Florida, but the citizens there could use your help by nudging the Feds to look at what is going on in that state i.e. –> inflating the numbers just to get more federal money.

    • #52821 Reply
      Avatar
      Facts should matterl

      “How are you protecting people from a so-called danger that doesn’t even have any jurisdictional tie to the state?” she asked. “It doesn’t make any sense.”

      Her statement is immaterial because community notification “Megan’s Law, AWA, etc.,) doesn’t mitigate risk, much less minimize risk. Here I am made out to be the “bad guy” when I’m actually a phantom threat My behavior has been reverse engineered by the government NOT for “safety,” but for PROFIT and political furtherance.

      I actually feel sorry for anyone in law enforcement that uphold, promote and defend these laws because they’re operating under the false assumption that they’re making a difference. Clearly they are not.

    • #52830 Reply
      Avatar
      Debra L Taylor

      My son diagnosed with high functioning autism at age 26 coinciding with his charge for viewing child porn who also has other severe mental health issues was convicted in Utah of a 3rd degree felony of attempt to exploit a minor. The Psych MD who diagnosed the autism attempted to explain to the court his lack of understanding of the offense because of the autism but he is on the registry for 10 years in Utah. I am appalled to learn of the practices in Florida and that a sex offender details from out of state is maintained on the registry. The documentary primarily focusing on Florida was just depressing but I watched it.

      I feel my son is a captive, as others know, it impacts every aspect of his life and now it only adds to my feeling that the government wants to imprison a sex offender for life even if there are no bars. I would need to tell him not to travel to Florida now. He has not traveled out of state since the conviction. Every day I live without hope and worry constantly about him when my husband and I are gone. My husband does not want to talk about it.

    • #53002 Reply
      Avatar
      joseph

      Florida Action Committee has a trust set up to fight the Out of State Challenge, Please help by making a donation so they can fight the false numbers being inflated by the State of Fla. If they had funds they can fight these artificially numbers in Court. Your donation weather time and money is highly Appericated!!

      • #53011 Reply
        Fred
        Fred
        Admin

        For your information, Florida Action Committee is an affiliate of NARSOL.

        • #53015 Reply
          Avatar
          joseph

          Thank you Fred! My burning questions are :Why Not hasn’t NARSOL made some type of donation to help get the Lawsuit going in Florida. This benefits everybody even those who live out of state, Because If we allowed one state to artically inflate their states Registry.Then others states will try to do the same.And My other Question What are NARSOL Plans to deal with this issue?

        • #53377 Reply
          Avatar
          Mike

          In 1945, George W. Bush married Barbara Pierce. She was 16 years old and he was 21. That is considered a sex offender on today’s law so George W. Bush could and should have been put on Sex Offender Registry, if he was still alive he could and should have been made to register as Sex Offender and they have made everyone who committed a sex offence before megans law have been made to retroactively register

          • #53388 Reply
            Sandy Rozek
            Sandy Rozek
            Admin

            First, it is a mistake to judge the past using the standards of the present. It just can’t be done with intellectual honesty.
            And secondly, in Texas, which is where the Bushes were, a person can get married at 14 with parental approval, and this is the law today, not only in Texas but in many states. One is not put on the registry for getting married according to the laws of the state one is in.

    • #53005 Reply
      Avatar
      Dustin

      Isn’t there some federal agency (Attorney General, maybe?) where this practice could be complained of? Pretty sure states exaggerating one thing or another for the sole purpose of securing more federal funding is at least an ethical violation of some kind. I would argue it’s flat out fraud.

      • #53420 Reply
        Avatar
        Mike

        That does not matter because they use everyone elses past to judge or determine if they will commit another crime, there are many people on the registry for doing what George Bush did, just because it’s the law like in Texas back then still does mean it’s right, so say in Texas it’s legal for what George Bush did and in California it’s illegal, so does that mean he is a just another married man but in California he is a sex offender? The only way this will change is to expose every judge, mayor, everyone in government, let them know how it feels, AND i can make a website and i can legally put everyone of them on it with the story word for word from the newspaper there picture, let the public know who we have running this country, plus i have more stories than that.

        • #53424 Reply
          Sandy Rozek
          Sandy Rozek
          Admin

          Mike, no one is put on the registry for getting legally married. For having sex with a 14 y-o..yes. For marrying one with her parents’ permission, no.
          And the 19 y-o who is involved with a 17 y-o in Texas or any other state where the age of consent is 16 or 17 is breaking no laws and won’t be on the registry, but the same couple doing the same thing in California or any other state where the age of consent is 18 is committing a crime and, unless specific laws are in place prohibiting it, runs the risk of being registered.

    • #53550 Reply
      Avatar
      Mike

      Hello i found some interesting information on the Doj they have a report stating recidivism rates are 3.5% and yet don’t say anything about but yet it is on there website for anyone to see & it’s on Smart.gov website almost identical report 3.5% I don’t understand why then is the registry is still up n running?

    • #53598 Reply
      Avatar
      Mike

      Hi Sandy you act like because its legal in texas and illeagal in California then it’s ok in texas but not in California how the heck does that make sense, how bout this a divorced couple share custody of there children and one parent allows the child to something that the other parent is highly against that means its ok here but not there? How confusing is that! So age of concent in texas is say 16yrs but in California it’s 18yrs how does that make both states right just because it’s the law? Sounds like your against SO’s by the way your talking because morally you are wrong!

      • #53795 Reply
        Avatar
        mr me

        It has always happened where sex before marriage or boyfriend girlfriend fooled around or fiancé or casual learning experiences……! But WATCH OUT TODAY ….HERE COMES THE BOOOTY PATROL !!!!!!! IF YOU EVEN ASK A GIRL OR BRUSH UP AGINST HER OR IMPLY SOMETHING….NOW IMAGINE IF YOU ARE ON A GOV. HIT LIST….HOW ANYTHING CAN AND WILL GET YOU IN BIG TROUBLE !!!!! AND HERES THE KICKER EVERYONE !!!!! SAYS YEP THE REGISTERED OR EX CRIMINALS HAVE A HIGHER TENDENCY TO DO WRONG…VIOLATE !!!!!!!!
        I TOLD A MAN THAT THERE IS NO SUPPORTING EVIDENCE THAT HIGHER EX CRIMINALS GO ON TO DO CRIMES AGAIN MORE THAN OTHER PEOPLE !!!!!!
        BUT YOU KNOW WHAT HAPPENED !!!!!!!!!
        I AND OTHERS HAVE TO CARRY THIER PAST AND NOW THE PUBLICS INVISIONED/CONJURED FUTURE CRIMES TO BOOT !!!!

    • #53651 Reply
      Avatar
      Mike

      Hello Sandy when i mentioned about George W Bush when he 21yrs and then girlfriend 16yrs n they got married and you brought up that was the law in Texas plus her parents signed paper stating that they gave permission but what i want answered is what heck was he doing going after and date a 16yr old that is perversed thinking and had no need to go after an under age child I’m positive that there were females over 18yrs but he went after underage girls and you try and state the law & parents ok but the point is what was his interest in 16 yr old girls according to judges and legislators that is perverse and is considered a Sex Offender, how can you defend him plus a gentleman posted on here that nothing will change until there dirty laundry is aired.

    • #54139 Reply
      Avatar
      Trent

      Speak a little truth to the people and they will lose their minds.

    • #54346 Reply
      Avatar
      Will

      If that floridia request for Money actually said in the legal request” punitiveness” as reason for collectionn, then law enforcement has legally stated officialy that the registery is a punitive action. further more all the quotes from politians, that word, that say things like we will make it so hard for sexoffenders to live in our state they will leave, reveal legally that the registery is really meant to harm offenders and not protect the public. this is sick and illegal to inflate the registery for cash and profit, proving again that confusing the public and getting tax payer money, creating life time slaves is whats really important to government.

    • #54347 Reply
      Avatar
      Svejk

      Yeah, I know I’m a little late to the party… I’ve just been removed from PA’s registry (where I live) after a year battling with the goofballs in Harrisburg who were skillfully ignoring me. Federal conviction here before the feds even had a registry, but sentenced in 1997 when there was a strict 10-year limit. I am STILL referenced on the Flori-duh and NV registries, but there is no longer a current location for me. I haven’t live in either of those states in 15 years!!
      tl;dr What if we hit them full on with a class action lawsuit. I’m still doing my research to see if the jibronis in either of these shitholes have agents in PA who I can serve with legal process. If anyone has the answer I’d appreciate a tipoff. I’m pissed and I’m coming after them!
      Svejk

      • #54395 Reply
        Avatar
        Sex Offender Truth

        Svejk,

        Florida is abusing this corrupt system by listing those such as you (and myself) who are listed but not living the state. This MUST END.

        Those who have the ability to get out of that sh*thole should not be held captive for life for no reason other than corrupt political gain (such as “professional victim” Florida Senator Lauren Book) and federal money. Not to mention that the “good” people of the state deserve to NOT be lied to about the effectiveness or even the TRUE use of the registry in that state.

        It most certainly has nothing to do with the monitoring of dangerous people in the state since 60% of those listed do not live in the state!

        I would be more than thrilled to join a class action suit so most certainly contact me about such an action to be included! I would also love to spread the word on my website SexOffenderTruth.com so please feel free to contact me there.

      • #61023 Reply
        Avatar
        Ann

        Florida Action Committee is a strong advocacy group in Florida who have an ex post facto lawsuit in the works and are collecting donations for a future OUT OF STATE lawsuit on behalf of those fraudulently stuck on FDLE’s corrupt registry. Please check it out! Florida should have a class action lawsuit for their fraudulent use of federal tax dollars.
        This affects a loved one I have who made the mistake of vacationing in Florida and checked in with the Sheriff to comply with their rules, not knowing they were using the registry fraudulently. He left Florida and when he called to ask why he wasn’t removed, he was told he never would be but that he was not required to update his registration because he lived out of state. https://floridaactioncommittee.org/donations/
        The goal of this legal challenge is to remove anyone on the registry who is not currently residing in the Florida community. Thank you, NARSOL, for giving us an avenue to speak out for justice.

Viewing 11 reply threads
Reply To: Florida’s artificially inflated sexual offense registry: More federal funds for the state?
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

  • *DO NOT POST LINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES
Your information:





<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">