This topic contains 15 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by Sharyn Ferrie 1 month, 4 weeks ago.
April 2, 2019 at 10:14 am #54094
By Max Green . . . A federal judge in Chicago has found the Illinois Department of Corrections is violating the constitutional rights of prisoners con
[See the full post at: Federal Judge: Continuing incarceration beyond the sentence in Illinois is unconstitutional]
April 3, 2019 at 7:18 am #54120
Would not these guys be able to sue since it is unconstitutional and a violation of their rights, and then use the money to hire a lawyer and get out? Why is the state not providing a lawyer for them?
April 3, 2019 at 7:18 am #54127
I hope there is an recompense effort for those who suffered under this. It is ludicrous to hold people in such a fashion.
April 4, 2019 at 5:42 pm #54187
Call it what it really is! Illegal sanctioned kidnapping under the guise of a administrative rule or slanted law.
April 4, 2019 at 5:43 pm #54192
This is a wonderful ruling, but the court needs to force the prison to release all those men and women who have been held illegally beyond their sentence expiration. You know the state will be sour grapes and likely drag its feet as slow as it can “finding and identifying” the ones who are to be released.
April 4, 2019 at 10:55 pm #54213
Yes the court ruled but that doesn’t mean much. See Michigan.
April 12, 2019 at 2:39 pm #54393
I’m curious as to what effect the ultimate outcome of this new class-action lawsuit will have throughout the 6th Circuit’s jurisdiction. If the whole ball of wax gets ruled unconstitutional as it was argued from MI state’s own newly elected A.G. in her amicus brief, what will that mean for the rest of the 6th circuit?
April 12, 2019 at 2:39 pm #54394
My son was given 5yrs to life for something he did not do, he is now in the 9th year of a LIFE sentence because he will not take their classes and admit to being a child molestor. He will not come out and be branded on the outside and be oustracized. He is at a standstill with the justice system and is now in prison for LIFE He was just lately assaulted by his cellmate fractured a vertebrae and was refused any medical treatment. This would not happen in North Korea!
April 5, 2019 at 6:26 pm #54248
Of course it is !!!! Does someone really have to spell that out !!! The fear factor and rules, regulations, and policies @ that entangled Civil and Constitutional laws in an unjust fashion is beyond being allowed in the first place much less the obvious lies to cover up the blatant flaws and violations of individuals rights to live free and without penalties! !! Duuhhh !!!
April 5, 2019 at 6:26 pm #54246
Is there going to be an effort to fight the residency restrictions then since it has now been shown to be punitive here?
April 12, 2019 at 2:39 pm #54396
My son got 5yrs to LIFE for something he did not do, he is now on the 9th year of a LIFE sentence because he will not take classes and will not admit to a child molestation charge. He feels that by taking the classes he is admitting guilt and that he cannot function in society with this brand on him. Only in America would this happen, it would not happen in North Korea. He is now in a standoff with the DOJ.
April 12, 2019 at 2:39 pm #54397
Sounds kind of like the civil commitment scenario that most states allow. Have two hired guns from the DAs office say your dangerous and they give you a life sentence because they think you might commit a crime in the future!
Where’s the crystal ball 🔮?
April 16, 2019 at 4:03 pm #54547
I don’t doubt for a second that ordinance resulting in extra jail time violates the U. S. constitution; nor do I dismiss that it was honorable of a federal judge to strike it down because of said-unconstitutionality. The more pertinent question at hand is: why was this BLATANTLY obvious unlawful ordinance put into place to begin with?
Answer: Politicians deliberately push for unnecessary sex offense laws and ordinances, knowing well that the state will be sued for it, in order to distract and deter the bigger issue from being addressed, which is the following:
A lot of sex offense laws, including some pertaining to minors, should not even BE laws to begin with. (Politicians individually and privately KNOW this!)
Politicians know these sex offense restrictions and ordinances will be struck down through lawsuit. They write these restrictions and ordinance for this very reason. By adding spikes (restrictions and ordinances) onto the already poisonous giant cactus (oppressive laws banning consensual sex between adults and SOME minors) , they can swindle us to focus inefficiently on attacking the spikes, causing us to forget the mission of chopping down the whole overwhelming cactus: By causing our advocacy focus on residency restrictions and ordinances, they can make us falsely feel like we’re moving mountains towards sex offender rights, all the while making REAL efforts to bring about REAL sex offender rights through Supreme Court modification or obliteration of oppressive federal Age of Consent and child sex offense laws seem too large and too unobtainable.
Politicians know that sex offense laws, in the way that they are written, don’t actually protect the public. They know it’s about the money.
April 25, 2019 at 10:33 am #54878
Locking folks up after original ordered sentence completion via “civil commitment” by jury was clearly intentionally punitive, but approved by elites in SCOTUS and all 51 states! Clearly that real underlying INTENT was bound to spread into criminal sanctions increasing in prison settings. The problem rests in intent, which was glossed over in the original question before the high court. Much time was devoted to the ” presumed effects” by attorneys but exerting NO RECORD of said effects. Much of the hypothetical asserted then (Otte v.) turned out ACCURATE and Affirmative. ( Packingham) but nevertheless INTENT behind the uses of online database broadcasts was more about those tools used opposed the men afflicted with plain indenture to machine upkeep.
April 25, 2019 at 10:44 pm #54914
Does the new ruling mean that the former restrictions are no longer going to keep offenders from going to homes that had previously been denied because of the Internet in the home, kids pictures or artwork, home daycare centers over a block away, etc?
May 15, 2019 at 5:27 am #55646
ONLINE SEX STING
This is yet more proof that online stings are run by the very perverts they want to believe that they are “protecting” kids from…these sicko cops pretend to be children to entrap men into asking for sex. Here is a recent sting operation that the police in Florida are so proud of.
NOTE that NOT a single registered sex offender was caught…however, one of the very policemen that participated in these stings deceiving others and trapping them was himself caught! Think he will end up registering as a sex offender…neither do I BUT the point is that these sort of entrapments do not nab registered sex offenders…you know…they ones that the government claims need to be watched and every move monitored.
Polk’s Sheriff Grady Judd says he got one of his own guys (more will certainly follow). Perhaps he should watch his men instead of so called registered sex offenders. Of course part of his job is to create more “sex offenders” to add to Florida’s inflated registry. Well done…keep it up and soon all your men will be locked up…problem solved.
During his latest crackdown, dubbed “Operation No Tricks, No Treats,” his deputies arrested Sgt. Luis Diaz, a 17-year veteran of the force. During that time, Diaz had taken part in undercover operations just like the one he was nabbed in. Sounds like rather a moron if you ask me.
May 27, 2019 at 8:22 pm #56199
Any updates on this?