The information provided on this page should be used with the utmost care and caution. What follows is NARSOL's best effort at answering many of the questions individuals have asked about various aspects of registration laws. However, individuals are highly encouraged to seek the best available legal advice about the laws in his or her state. State laws frequently change. So, please be knowledgeable about your state's laws and, where in doubt, seek legal advice. If you have a question you think NARSOL can answer, please contact us and someone will respond to you. If we can't answer your question, we will tell you that.
The registry as punishment
Actually, some states do register other categories of offender. There have been calls for animal abuser registries and police misconduct registries. This is another strong reason why we must stand up and fight. Once the public has grown to accept such a terrible infringement on one group’s liberties, the government will feel free to take that liberty from others.
It ought to be, but public registration is not considered “punishment”, legally speaking. When created, registry laws were categorized as a “civil regulatory scheme” like the permit required to own a firearm or earning a driver’s license. As a civil regulation, it can be changed at any time by your elected representatives.
Nothing. Absolutely nothing. You’re on the registry because you either were found guilty, pled guilty/no contest, or took an Alford plea to a sexual crime. But nobody – absolutely nobody – deserves the public humiliation and harassment of the public registry.
Most people, if you ask them, would probably say it IS punishment. Even some lawmakers agree. But the last time public registration was challenged all the way to the US Supreme Court, that court decided registration was NOT punitive. And at that time, it probably wasn’t. The complainant mailed in an update once a year, and his picture was on the Internet. That’s it. But much has changed since then, and a new case must be taken to the Supreme Court to change that decision.
The public has a genuine right to have access to a person’s conviction records. These have always been public and are increasingly easy to locate as states and counties move to online data storage. However, AFTER supervision is complete, does the public have the right to:
- Track a person’s every move?
- Receive constant updates of personal information?
- Receive notifications when a former offender moves into the neighborhood?
- Know what vehicles a person owns or drives?
- Know where that person attends school?
- Know where that person is employed?
The constitutionally correct answer is a resounding “NO.” Until former offenders take a stand against these encroachments on their liberties, however, things will continue to get worse.
Nobody – absolutely NOBODY – deserves the humiliation of public registration. It is simply a government-sponsored form of harassment and profiling, and there is no clear evidence that public registration has been effective in preventing sexual abuse of minors or adults. Those of us who are in this fight must ALL pull together to fight public registration. If someone needs to be supervised in the interest of public safety, that supervision should be a part of his/her actual sentence and does not need to be publicized to be effective.
Pleas and sentences
As long as registration is considered to be a civil regulatory scheme, the State is allowed to change the registration requirements whenever it sees a need. Unlike the courts, lawmakers have not made any agreements with the person convicted of the sex offense. If lawmakers believe that changing public registration requirements will keep children safe, they can simply draft a law to change those requirements, and the law is presumed to be constitutional.
Withdrawal of a guilty plea is possible but extremely difficult. You would have to be willing to hire a lawyer, present lots of solid evidence that establishes your actual innocence that was not available at the time of your plea, and hope that the judge/jury is more sympathetic than your original lawyer predicted. In other words, it’s a crap shoot.
You aren’t going to like this answer: In most instances, judges actually do not “sentence” someone to a particular period of registration. They merely point out that the duty to register will be a consequence of your conviction. In most jurisdictions, a judge has no control over the duration of someone’s registration. The Court merely advises that the conviction itself will trigger registration requirements at the time it imposes the sentence.
That depends on what you want the lawyer to do. If you simply want to complain about having to register, there is likely little he/she can do. If you want to challenge some unconstitutional aspect of registration, there might be an attorney in your state interested in pursuing that angle.
Not likely. Withdrawal of a plea is extremely difficult in most situations. You would have to prove that your plea was not “knowingly and intelligently” entered, and that is all but impossible because of the string of questions you were asked at the time of the plea. Those questions were asked for the sole purpose of preventing you from having “buyer’s remorse” later.
Getting off the registry
Moving to other jurisdictions to avoid registration is probably not an option. Most states have catch-all provisions in their registration laws that require a new arrival to register if that person is obligated to register in the convicting state. You can research various states to see what their requirements are for someone with your specific conviction.
We don’t get into the referral business. Here’s why:
- What looks like green pastures one day can turn into hell the next with our ever-changing laws. It’s impossible for anyone to keep totally accurate information on all 50 states plus territories.
- What seems like an “easy” burden for one person, could be a deal-breaker for another. Say, one person is a homebody but another travels frequently for work; reporting all travel in advance or providing itineraries would be harsh for the second person, but not the first.
- Every state has differences in how it tiers or levels registrants. A “tier 1” with 3 years left in a 10-year term could move to another state and find himself to be in “level 2” and on the list for lifetime. NARSOL’s state law wiki may be a place to start reviewing laws in each state. Finding out what your registration level would be takes even more digging.
There is no way to easily “get off the registry.” The majority of states do not have any sort of removal process in their laws. If your state has no removal process, you basically have two legal options, and one legislative option.
- You can file a personal challenge in the hope that you can get your original conviction overturned or reversed. This is an extreme long shot, especially if you entered a guilty plea or Alford Plea. Withdrawing a plea is extremely rare. It will mean re-opening your case, and the serious potential of being convicted and sentenced. If you are convicted after a new trial, the sentence would most likely be more severe than the first one was. That is the risk you take.
- You can file a constitutional challenge, claiming a retroactive increase in punishment, prior restraint on travel, or whatever claim works best depending on your state’s laws. This is expensive, you will need a good lawyer who handles constitutional claims, and like any legal challenge, there is no guaranteed outcome.
- You can lobby to change or remove the registry laws and regulations in your state of residence.
We wish we could say you can get on with your life and put this behind you, but unfortunately you cannot. You may very well be required to register in another state, depending on which state you choose, even though you have been removed where you currently live. Completion of a registration requirement in one state is not binding on any other state. An extreme example would be Alabama, which requires registration for life regardless of when the person was convicted, or for what sexual offense.
Since public registration is a “civil regulatory scheme,” each state determines how to apply its registration scheme and to whom. Registration is a patchwork of 50 different statutory schemes plus a plethora of locally-imposed ordinances. This is much like your vehicle registration, where each state determines which vehicles are exempt and which ones must pay or be inspected.
The new state could find out about your previous conviction any number of ways:
- An officer could run a criminal history at a routine traffic stop;
- You could apply for something from the government such as a driver’s license or Social Security; or
- A person from your old state who knows your conviction could notify the new state.
To determine if you have to register where you are moving, you must carefully examine the laws in that state. Factors include the date and statute of conviction, whether similar offenses must register in the new state, and what their laws say about persons coming from another state. Our advice for anyone in this situation is to consult a legal professional in the state you are contemplating relocating to. To make a sound decision, the legal professional will need specific information regarding your conviction including dates and statutes of conviction and date of release from all obligations imposed by the court.
Bringing down the registry
No, it will not stop. “Sex Offenders” are the new lepers of modern society. Many people believe that they are no longer humans. Look at the Jews in the Holocaust. Look at the early Christians in Rome. We must stand up and stand proud and let everyone know that once our punishment is complete, we deserve the same respect that any other human being deserves, and should receive the same treatment from our government as any other US citizen.
We can explain until we are blue in the face. If we are good at explaining, our lawmakers will “get it.” But then they have to be willing to propose changing the laws. They are every bit as terrified of taking a stand against sexual offender registration, as are the registrants themselves.
No. But there is also significant risk in doing nothing at all. As long as lawmakers and law enforcement think nobody cares what they do, they WILL continue to make things worse. But once we start to fight back we will begin to see change.
As an individual, the biggest thing you can do is let your legislator know how these laws have impacted your life. Tell them what you have done to improve yourself as a person, how hard you have worked to move on, how certain you are that you are NOT a danger to ANYONE. Explain how doors are shut in your face when you apply for work, try to rent a room or apartment, or attempt to take classes at the local community college. If you are a member of your state’s advocacy group, they may be able to help you develop a public testimony for use at a hearing when a new law is introduced. Or perhaps there will be specific letters to write. The important thing is to GET INVOLVED. You can learn as you go along!
It’s very unlikely that you will be arrested for communicating with an elected official, because that is your right. You are their constituent and represent a potential vote for them in the next election. They will listen to you – even if they don’t much care for people with sex offense records as a whole. You can simply make an appointment with your representative and talk with him/her in an office. Be on your best professional behavior and share your message as concisely and clearly as possible. Will it change his/her mind? Maybe not – but no harm will come from it.
Public testimony does carry some risk but you will not be arrested just for testifying at a hearing. Even people under supervision have that right. However, you might be recognized or your face could be shown on television. If you aren’t “out” with your employer or neighbors, or if law enforcement in your jurisdiction tend to be unfriendly to registrants, that could mean trouble. If this is a show-stopper for you, consider calling or sending written testimony instead.
Keep in mind that the federal government does not operate sex offender registries, the states do. Congress passed the AWA in 2006 hoping to convince the states to strengthen their registries and offered them financial incentives to do so. At the same time, it threatened them with a 10% reduction in their Byrne Grants if they did not. The only realistic challenge that can be mounted at the federal level is seeking the repeal of the AWA.
Class Action Lawsuits are vastly misunderstood. First, it is extremely difficult to have a case certified as a “Class Action.” The Plaintiff seeking such a certification must convince the Court that he/she can adequately represent the interests of all class members. This includes providing everyone in the class written notice of the action along with their option to opt out of the class. Second, recovery of any damages would be very unlikely since there is simply no case law to support the theory that registration in and of itself inflicts additional damage beyond what is caused by the underlying conviction.
Probably, but not necessarily. It varies greatly from state to state because some state constitutions provide greater constitutional protections for state citizens than the U.S. Constitution does. In fact, there have been several (limited) favorable decisions already handed down by state supreme courts.
That is a large amount of money for most registrants, but it is not excessive due to what is involved in this type of litigation. Your state will diligently fight every challenge to registration, and it has unlimited financial resources to use against you. You can expect a long, protracted battle, and if you should be granted relief, the state will almost certainly appeal.
That has been done in some jurisdictions. However, it can complicate the issue. Each Plaintiff has different facts surrounding his/her underlying conviction, e.g., date of commission, age of victim. Since it has already been determined that registration in and of itself is not facially unconstitutional, that means all the challenges will be on an “as applied” basis. More Plaintiffs mean that the case will proceed at a slower pace and that the Court’s overall analysis could be unfavorably impacted by a particular Plaintiff’s facts.
No it would not. Repeal of the AWA would only (1) remove the feds’ ability to prosecute those that travel to other jurisdictions and fail to register or keep their registrations current, and (2) remove the threat of financial penalties for states that are non-complaint. Even if the AWA were repealed, all 50 states would still have public registries. And you can be certain that no state would rush to repeal its registration laws.
We agree that challenges should be made where appropriate. However, there will never be a single federal case that will bring down the registry once and for all. Registration of persons with sex offenses is not done by the federal government. There are 50 distinctly different registry schemes in operation around the United States. Some are more punitive than others. Some registrants only report by mail for 10 years and their street address is not published on the internet. For these people, registration has not been sufficiently transformed by crazy politicians to the point that it is unconstitutional.
Don’t interpret this as endorsement of registration schemes. We firmly believe that all registration schemes should be abolished. We also agree that it would be preferable if more states utilized a risk-based approach. However, that is a policy choice for our elected officials to make. The courts do not have the authority to save us from bad policy choices made by our lawmakers. They can only strike down laws that clearly violate the constitution. In that situation, it is OUR burden as the challenging party to demonstrate by the “clearest of proof” that a law is unconstitutional.
When a particular state crosses that line and registration requirements become punitive, NARSOL believes that the law should be challenged. Please understand that constitutional challenges are very expensive, because every state will vigorously defend its duly enacted laws. We would love to undertake challenges all over the United States but lack the financial resources to do so. Will you join and support us?
Can they really do that?
As a general rule, you should always have competent legal counsel when facing criminal charges. Maybe you will get a reasonable prosecutor who will consider the circumstances and choose not to proceed. Even if you are formally charged with and convicted of a registry violation, however, most courts do not impose the maximum sentence, and at the state level often impose probation.
Absolutely you can tell them no, but only if you’ve completed all supervision. In order to enter a non-supervised person’s home, a law enforcement officer needs either a warrant, or the person’s permission. Remember, though, that your housemate or a family member might open the door and unknowingly invite them in. At that point, arguably they have been granted permission to enter the residence.
As a general rule, your probation/parole officer has the right to visit and enter your home with no notice. However, there may be departmental policies or case law in your state that limits their visits to reasonable hours. If your state’s probation/parole supervision policies are on the Internet, you can check there for specifics.
The short answer is that there is not much you can do once such a directive has been issued. However, you can take steps to make such a difficult request less likely in the first place. Provide your supervising officer with a current copy of your work schedule. Make sure that you can prove you have given it to him/her! This is best accomplished by faxing a copy of it and keeping the confirmation sheet. Do not ask for a signed receipt from the officer. This will put him/her on the defensive.
It is possible that they can – but in most jurisdictions the standard for removal of children is that Protective Services must be able to prove that the child is suffering some form of abuse or neglect. Simply having a registrant in the household would not meet that standard in and of itself. However, that might not stop Protective Services from contacting your supervising officer and requesting the imposition of restrictions.
Many states have language in their registry laws that prohibit such conduct and provide for both civil and criminal penalties. If you can prove that a particular person is engaging in such behavior, you should certainly file a complaint. Filing a police report provides documentation of the harassment which you might later need in court. However, do not expect a robust response from the police, due to your status as a registrant.
There is no good answer to this question, because there is no case law out there that offers guidance. These private listing sites think it’s okay to call all registrants predators, pedophiles, or child molesters. We disagree – but until there is a successful lawsuit that is upheld on appeal, they probably will not stop. Unfortunately, an attorney would hesitate to take this litigation on a contingency fee basis, because his/her chances of recovery are slim.
First, understand that you are not alone. Find a Fearless group, join Connections or another online forum for persons impacted by registration where you can talk to someone who understands. The next step is to take action! Check on this web site to find an advocacy group in your state and contact them. Try to attend a meeting if this is practical. Become part of something bigger than just yourself. It makes a world of difference. If you are feeling suicidal, or truly are unable to function, please – seek professional help as soon as possible. This cause needs YOU to be involved!
Certainly the fact that an elected official is out grandstanding is disappointing. However, grandstanding is not uncommon for an elected official, and the sheriff is entitled to his/her misguided views. This is precisely why educating our elected officials is so crucial. A sheriff of all people should already know that there are many people listed on registries that have never touched a child inappropriately or committed a predatory act.