Does v. Swearingen: Attorneys file Objection to States Second Motion to Dismiss This topic has 0 replies, 1 voice, and was last updated 1 year, 8 months ago by admin. Viewing 0 reply threads Author Posts August 5, 2019 at 8:07 pm #58760 Reply admin Attorneys for the Doe Plaintiffs in what we are referring to as the “Ex Post Facto Plus” challenge have filed their objection to the Florida Departmen[See the full post at: Does v. Swearingen: Attorneys file Objection to States Second Motion to Dismiss] Author Posts Viewing 0 reply threads Reply To: Does v. Swearingen: Attorneys file Objection to States Second Motion to Dismiss We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind... *You must be 18 or older to comment. *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions. *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator. *Moderating decisions may be subjective. *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted. *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation. *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum. *Do not post in ALL CAPS. *Stay on topic. *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person. *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites. *DO NOT POST LINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES Your information: Name (required): Mail (will not be published) (required): Website: You may use these <abbr title="HyperText Markup Language">HTML</abbr> tags and attributes: <a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width=""> Cancel Submit