[Sandy RozekAdmin]

CHICAGO (AP) — A federal judge in Chicago says a corrections department ban on telephone contact between a mom with a sex-crime conviction and her 17-
[See the full post at: Blanket sex offender bans? Judge says no]

[Maestro]

I just love how certain news media sites REQUIRE you to have a Facebook account in order to log into their news sites to leave comments on articles. Do they think they are stopping RSO’s from voicing our opinions because we’re banned from Facebook? Facebook is not the end-all-be-all of social media and they’ve got their own problems and lawsuits happening.
There are tons of people with no criminal records who choose to NOT use Facebook. And because of that, they cannot comment on articles. Ridiculous!

[Anonymous]

This commenting thing is the best because one needn’t create an account to post, but still I prefer Disqus (which is very easy to set up on a website for free.)

[Tim]

FREEDOM OF SPEECH! Sucker-sucker berg-ville
Mr. Zuckerberg was questioned recently by congressional members and was asked if his firm has engaged in quashing free speech. He, more or less, denied it. “Conservatives” especially seemed concerned.

NARSOL has a FB ACCT though registrants are forbidden. This is why state demands electronic data. Emails can be read then. Emails used to enforce affirmative disability. All emails have tracking data including:isp#, date/,time, routsinfo. This is the info collected under 702(see eff.org). Call it metadata. It is users responsibility to withhold data from the net. If one banks online one risks PERIOD.

WE HAVE not merely the right to speak but the DUTY. Mr. FB certainly does engage in blocking speech. Has the court and congress opened the door to civil suit?

[D]

It was only because it was a female sex offender anyway. The sexual Bias in the legal system is just as ridiculous as the unconstitutional activities.

[Saddles]

This blanket ban from what some say is unconstitutional. Two yrs. ago I had to take a suprise polygraph test, they told me the best thing it was free. So I’m takng the test and at the end of the test I mentioned I was on facebook to sign up to do telephone campaging for Donald Trump at the time. I’m not sure if I actually signed up when the campaign lady gave me the link to sign up but when I mentioned that on the polygraph test I was called to the PO’s office and we had a few words.
Well that was a useless trip back to court because my PO said you broke my word and I’m wondering that they gave me use of internet for my business contacts but this signing up to do phone campaiging for trump sounded a bit too much for me to handle. I guess the PO is a person’s God in a way. Its like you follow my orders type of thing. Bottom line is authorities are always right or is this sword of justice going a bit too far in this perfect constitutional world.

[Tim]

Benefits of operating a database for political purposes control the vote. Felons under sentence may not vote. Registrants are more likely to be refellonised.

[Tim L]

No blanket ban????

Illinois supreme court just upheld blanket ban on SOs in Illinios parks.The

So which is it?

[Sandy RozekAdmin]

Each case is individual to the issue and the court. A ruling against a blanket ban on communication by one court does not equal a ruling against a blanket ban on proximity restrictions by another.

[Author]

Posts