Reply To: Federal judiciary finally sees light: Restrictions are punishment


It is the direct dissent and jusrisprudency involved that exposed the true intention of this thinly veiled laws. You have jurist who respect the exact interpretation of the constitution and others whom seek pompous point making regarding their own self asorbed understanding with egotistical English comprehension breakdown.

From the military courts to the district courts all the prosecutorial pundits are concerned about is the notch and the number and the banishment becomes their perpetual pet project from the self righteous tool box.