Reply To: California IML challenge dismissed as premature

“A certainly impending” she said

Hamilton wrote, “Because the passport provisions are not yet in effect (and the procedures have not been finalized), plaintiffs cannot show a certainly impending injury.”

However, the US Government can send notifications overseas that “a certainly impending” sex offense will occur by RC’s traveling to other countries based upon a person’s history or because of a government provided label based upon history?

The US Government can actually make that case with fact?

No, I doubt the US Gov’t can do that.