Reply To: California IML challenge dismissed as premature

#9224
Avatar
“A certainly impending” she said

Hamilton wrote, “Because the passport provisions are not yet in effect (and the procedures have not been finalized), plaintiffs cannot show a certainly impending injury.”

However, the US Government can send notifications overseas that “a certainly impending” sex offense will occur by RC’s traveling to other countries based upon a person’s history or because of a government provided label based upon history?

The US Government can actually make that case with fact?

No, I doubt the US Gov’t can do that.