I would call this ‘GOVERNMENT SPONSORED SEXUAL RECIDIVISM.’
“Unintended Consequences” is a two way street however what happens when you have hard cross-validated fact proving the contrary?
Does ‘political grandstanding’ still rule the roost?
Does ‘Burning Down the House to Roast the Pig’ still stand to reason?
If public safety is really the issue and not “double jeopardy” then what? Jeopardy is jeopardy despite a clear definition of the word itself being left to a judiciaries individualized interpretations.