Reply To: Packingham case asks: Is First Amendment negotiable?

#8255
Avatar
T

So let me get this straight all registrants being cutoff from society because they are a risk to the public, force to comply with various strict ordinances that are extremely counterproductive, mandatory requirements to be on public notifications claiming this will increase public awareness and safety which is nothing more than exploitation of citizens for the things they’ve done and claim registrants will reoffend in the future just to make their lives miserable. Shouldn’t this be a human rights issue?