Reply To: NARSOL demands stoppage of in-person check-ins for those on the registry

#69882
Avatar
Tim in WI

FACT 1,
SCOTUS, The Rehnquist court specified ” there is no in person reporting requirements in the record in this complaint. ” weighing ALASKA’s version had its benefits. Geographical distance for required update in Alaska not really doable as strict liability and Alaska’s congress new it.

It is habeas corpus that touchstones legal custody! The time and effort going to and from in person duties count as lost (abridged) liberty too.