Reply To: AWA Loses in Pennsylvania’s Highest Court – Discussion Continued

#46560
Avatar
Anonymous

Terry my friend,
I believe you are making a big mistake ignoring the ex post facto argument. You can make 2 arguments. Besides, being previously convicted, you do not need the law to fall. Only thing you need is for the law to be ruled as punishment and you would be immune to it.
You could make both arguments. One, you believe the law is unsound, and even if they disagree with you there, it is a violation of the ex post facto clause.
It seems like you think you can only argue one or the other. I don’t believe that is true

Besides, you claiming that expired law cannot come back ignores their WHOLE POINT: that Act 10 is NOT the same as ML2.

With respect my friend,
Chuck .