Reply To: “The law is not always what is right”

Tim L

Dude you got the makings of sound legal thought here. All three cases u mentioned above are legit fodder ( applicable) to SORNA. In Brown v board the court avoided ruling on the constitutional claim, and decided on other grounds. to paraphrase that court: ‘ The distinction intolerable.’ I’m wondering if you can utilize that phrase and apply it to our situation? Mill it around some in the old reason bucket. The people supporting brown won that case, but how’s their approach different from ours so far? IMHO that is 🔑 to what we must do.