Thank you for your response Robin, and all of your efforts.
Wow, that’s an interesting and unique approach; and one I had not considered. So….taking the idea deeper…Having Pastors also listed as the plaintiff, opens up the idea that their (The Pastors) religious rights may also be hindered by the government because the current law against offenders also greatly affects a Pastors ability to exercise their freedom of religion? In other words, the current law prevents a pastor from reaching a segment of society, that their beliefs would require them to reach out to? Am I understanding that correctly?
If so, I think that’s a unique, and great argument to make.