Registrants V terrorists.
Are not registered persons considered domestic terrorists of sorts?
Exactly the correlated interest inherent the governmental uses of databases. Exactly why the Surveillance Saints NEEDED the ruling in Alaska v. Doe. The collateral USE of a database for safety. A group to whom I am familiar, Electronic Frontier Foundation (eff.org) formed to combat and confront their idea that as Jusice Scalia put it, “I would think the United States government should use the DATABASE for whatever it pleases.”
The sex offender made the perfect scapegoat for the perceived need. The ruling flung open the doors to potential unfettered government USE of the device. Just wait and see how facial recognition plays out. Is the road to help paved with good intentions?