Reply To: AWA Loses in Pennsylvania’s Highest Court – Discussion Continued


Terry I hear you. I was just trying to say That lets say all pre SORNA people were removed a few months ago Then the legislators decided Lets make a new law to capture the people that were taken off the reg and we will use the language of an old law that has been expired but before was shown to be civil only. So they think they can apply it retro active. Muniz only says SORNA is punitive not ML 1 or 2. This is what they are saying is the reason why they can pick pre SORNA cases. However you are saying they can’t because they would have had to be still under a law for them to apply it to them. You would have to show the person was never under SORNA in the first place to do that.