Reply To: AWA Loses in Pennsylvania’s Highest Court


I think they keep changing back and forth to mess up everyone who is challenging Act 10, so for instance, say you file a case against Act 10 then they all of the sudden cancel act 10 and then switch back to 1952, your case already says act 10 challenge, you can’t just change it over to 1952 in the middle, you have to refill like Terry had to do because he was already fighting 1952, and tried to add Act 10 in but they said you have to refile, so I think just to be safe anyone who’s going to file a suit you should include Act 10, 1952 and just to be safe SB631 in case they have something up their sleeve.. that’s just a theory, not anything I have evidence of seeing.