Reply To: AWA Loses in Pennsylvania’s Highest Court

#39897

terry brunson

@ Mark

The PAG is getting cold feet – I have not seen a Brief yet –

I took your advice the Notice to Defend it it under RAP rule 1018.1

I amended the complaint to add ACT 10 fight on expiration of former Megan’s Laws – it is impossible to be under ACT 10 without a former Megan’s Law. It is a simple position that will be hard to break by the PAG

If You do not have a letter from the PSP you should call Megan’s Law section and most assure go to the barracks troop and say something, or you may be playing with fire.

You can also read R.A.P. Rule 1531 special relief injunction on ACT 10 and ask for a hearing.