Reply To: AWA Loses in Pennsylvania’s Highest Court

#39787
Avatar
terry brunson

@all
It is May 2, 2018 and I am filling a writ that will change the ACT 10 picture for all that it involves.

The Pa Commonwealth sold its soul to the AWA being the law that would given them money if the Commonwealth would EXPIRE ALL OLD MEGAN’S LAWS ON THE PA BOOKS TO GET THE MONEY. Or in teir terms come into compliance with AWA.

The Commonwealth came up with SORNA to Expire all former Megan’s laws. See 42 Pa. C.S. 9799.14
(all Megan’s laws SHALL – EXPIRE)

The statutory construction ACT of 1 Pa. C.S.A. 1971(a) says: SORNA purported a revision of all statutes covering the entire subject matter of former statues called Megan’s Law and intended SORNA to be the substitute for all old former Megan’s law statutes. 42 Pa. C.S. 9799.14 says that all Megan’s laws shall expire) SORNA shall is the constructed Law that SHALL EXPIRE all former Megan’s laws on the same subject.

Commonwealth v Pennybaker No. 1068 WDA 2014 is the case that pointed this out to me.

I said this in my original Mandamus 0n 13 Oct 2017 when Chuck and I talked me going to court back in October 2017. I think this is the win over ACT 10. Me as a cracker Jack lawyer will object one more time to show the court this logic that Megan’s Law Ill was expired by SORNA on 12-20-12 and SORNA has nothing to do with me under chapter 97 subchapter “H” and in order to give life to 42 Pa. C.S. chapter 97 subchapter “I” there must be a former Megan’s Law to attached from after 1996 before 12 December 2012 to give enforcement to 42 Pa. C.S. 97 subchapter “I”

If anyone has a offense before 12-20-12 (Muniz -decision killed all retroactive application to SORNA)

And at the same time SORNA expired all Megan’s law applications 12-20-12 and made them dead laws. ACT 10 which is now 42 Pa. C.S. 97 subchapter “I” that people before 12-20-12 must comply with before 22 May 2018 is based on having a former Megan’s law violation, BUT ALL MEGAN’S LAWS were expired by SORNA 12-20-12. If my offense is before that date then YOU do the logic. . . . . . . . . . . There is no former Megan’s Laws to attach to 42 Pa. C.S. 97 subchapter “I” after 1996 and before 12 December 2012.

Commonwealth v. Pennybaker No. 1068 WDA 2014 is the case that pointed this out to me under 1 Pa C.S.A. 1971(a) and 42 Pa. C.S. 9799.14 says that all Megan’s laws shall expire 12-20-12