Reply To: SCOTUS Denies to Hear Muniz

#36695
Avatar
Patrick

@ Dave Judge Matsch’s decision in the Colorado case was an “as appilied” challenge. Which means the ruling only appilied to those who sued. It would be interesting if the Commonwealth claimed the Neiman, DeHammer, and Muniz decisions were “as appilied” challenges. Even if they were, it wouldn’t help the Commonwealth as all one would have to do is challenge it for themselves citing the above rulings as precedent.