Reply To: SCOTUS Denies to Hear Muniz

#36520
Avatar
Patrick

@ Dave,

CONGRADULATIONS!!! Perhaps you needed to cite Commonwealth v Neiman (2013). Neiman found Megan’s Law 3 to be unconstitutional. Neiman and Muniz together should get you off.

I can’t wait until we can take the “pending” tag off of Act 10 so it can be challenged.