I am reading over this article again, and I am still not sure how you got the impression that this church is being stereotyped in any way. The only reason this church appears to be mentioned is because the spokesperson for this church gave a statement claiming that all people are welcome, when in fact not all people are welcome. This means the writer was stating a fact and exercising journalistic integrity, and the person Mig spoke to actually confirmed what she reported. Further more, from the writer’s comment below showing where she did her research, it appears that the person Mig spoke to either was being dishonest, or was misinformed, as according to Sandy’s sources, only registrants on some form of community supervision are barred from emergency shelters.
Can you show us specifically what lines in the article you consider to be biased?