Reply To: Pennsylvania Legislature attempts to “fix” unconstitutional law

Tim Lawver

The most important aspect of the ruling here for pre-Megans law convicted is the INTENT of the people has been exposed. They intended to punish those already convicted. While SCOTUS 2003 found no punitive INTENT in the Whetterling act they can no longer make that claim. The proof is in the banishment! That was always going to be the goal of such another,” electronic regulatory regime…TO IMPOSE AFFIRMATIVE DISABILITY AND RESTRAINT PERIOD!

Soon we will see the use of facial recognition devices in America to do the same thing. The devices are cheap to produce but are worthless without the all important DATABASE. Thus we see recently Mr. Schumer making law that opened the FBI database to the general public. He’s gotta have some financial interest in there somewhere.