Reply To: AWA Loses in Pennsylvania’s Highest Court

#26873
Avatar
Chuck

@Brian

I was trying to be sarcastic. The key is they would have to make changes to Adam Walsh to make it non puntitive. If they did that, then they could make it retroactive. The thing is this: The only way I see them making it “non puntitive” is to make it non public. In other words, the public can not access it , but law enforcement could. However, I do not think people want to do that. Yet, I guess if it meant a non public or no registry at all, I guess they would come around real quick.
If they pass a new law and attempt to tell me I have to register on it, I am going to fight it. I would love to see what the ACLU has to say about this.