Reply To: PA’s high court rules retroactive SORNA violates constitution

#24919
Avatar
terry brunson

The SCOTUS will never accept Muniz – Freed’s Cert petition will be denied on docket call Just like Synder of Michigan 2 Oct 2017

The stay the the PASC issued is only on the Federal question on U.S. Constitution Article 1 Section 10 – But the state rights issue is final final final. The Stay on State rights and the stay on Federal rights are not the same. . . . . .

If the Stay for Muniz is in effect, it is obviously only in effect for the Federal. All these cases have came out after the STAY OF SEPT 5 2017. SOME POWER HOUSE CASES TOO!

We will see next week how many more cases come through decided using Muniz, during this stay.

http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/25181722.pdf#search=%22sorna Muniz 2017%22

http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/j-a21023-17m.pdf#search=%22sorna Muniz 2017%22

http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/judgment%20order%20-%20vacated-remanded%20-%2010322271522995966.pdf#search=%22sorna Muniz 2017%22

http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/25037847.pdf#search=%22sorna Muniz 2017%22

http://www.pacourts.us/assets/opinions/Superior/out/24192333.pdf#search=%22sorna Muniz 2017%22