Reply To: Tenth Circuit splits in holding revocation enhancements for SOs unconstitutional

#20522
Avatar
W.C._TN

Basically that provision of law was saying, “We’re going to put the screws to you much more harshly simply because you’re a sex offender (child molester, rapist, etc.) and because we can and get away with it.

It seems the chokehold the states have on sex offenders is being weakened bit by bit as courts around the nation start applying some long overdue honest jurisprudence.