Reply To: NO! We don’t need another sex offender law to fight

#19581

Jonny everyman

Good points Sandy. It applies to those who have a sexual interest in pre pubescent children. It’s unfortunate if someone has relations with a 16 or 17 year old they still get labeled one.

My evaluation noted it’s normal for a man to have a slight interest in pubescent teens. The key was not to act on them.