Reply To: NO! We don’t need another sex offender law to fight


It’s really sad when the man that wrote the article in “Psychology Today” about the “frightening and high” myth admitted years later that there was NO scientific basis for that claim since he was jockeying to get a lucrative sex offender treatment contract with the state of California. This disreputable tripe saw dollar signs and wrote a lie that has persisted well beyond the mid-to-late ’80s when it was penned. He has since come out and denounced the lie himself, but it’s the basis for precedence in jurisprudence and will likely never be renounced by the very court that has relied on that lie to evaluate sex offender laws since that initial ruling.