Jeremy from Indiana
Most of the people on the “list” don’t “abuse” any of the unconstitutional laws. I refuse to take your advice to trade residency restrictions for “loitering” laws. Those are just as bad, if not worse. So, now, presuming the registrant has a job of course, he or she has to determine a route to work that is not in violation of this loitering law. Furthermore, even the low pay jobs that require local traveling (trash man, carpet cleaner, cable installer) are now off limits, as if there aren’t enough jobs off limits. What’s the point in giving more options for someone to have a residence if they remove the options for the person to be able to afford such residence?