Reply To: Michigan files supplemental brief replying to solicitor general

#17839

Smith

Again, even though SCOTUS Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. sided with the court on the recent social media ruling, the fact that he is the SAME ATTORNEY who argued BEFORE the Supreme Court in 2003 to uphold sex offender registration and notifcation is very concerning. Should SCOTUS agree to hear Michigan AG’s Writ, Roberts should do the right thing and recuse himself…then again, he didn’t do the right thing in 2003 when he trampled all over the Constitution, so it’s probably a moot point…otherwise, he would, in effect, have to admit he was wrong in 2003.

See: https://www.montanaprobono.net/geo/search/download.71936
(scroll down to the 2003 Alaska case)