Toxic Activism in Trials-by-Media

By Sean Bw Parker . . . With the rolling out of the #MeToo-inspired “consent” push in the late 2010s, the majority of allegations of rape went from being one of intentional sexual violence to one of highly-disputed and finely-nuanced messaging.

The corruption in the MeToo movement had been bubbling since the signing of the Title IX “Campus rape” order in 2011 and eventually ran into the Depp-Heard trial in England, which went against Depp; the outcome of this was the exoneration of Depp in the trial in America and the finding that Amber Heard had lied in her allegations of physical and sexual abuse against her ex-husband.

The question of what domestic violence was, and who perpetuated it, had been forever changed in this mega-watched Trial-by-Media, with one conclusion being absolute: Loving relationships could easily turn toxic. The case also turned the idea of consent on its head.

Sexual activity which traditionally had been called sexual misadventure, regretted sex, or sex-gone-wrong has recently been industrialized with almost total demonization of the alleged perpetrator.

Toxic activism in academia was destroying the reputations of already prohibitively expensive universities from Stanford in the U.S. to Cambridge in the U.K., and these new radicalizers’ messages were eagerly amplified by a largely responsibility-free social media landscape.

Lawyers across the English-speaking world would cry the equivalent of Nil Mens Rea (No guilty mind) in court, desperately trying to protect the futures of promising PE students and football players. The heavily subsidized Time’s Up campaign, originated in America, was then merrily shipped across the Atlantic to continued profits in England.

Over the course of two decades, the traditional crime of rape had moved from being a surprise act of forced, sexual violence to a glittering spectrum of intimate situations, from drunken sex to “friend rape” to statutory rape, or “statch” as it is called in the new youth parlance.

The mothers and partners of the accused, waiting for years while their loved ones were arrested, investigated, trialled, convicted, and imprisoned, would be told, “He’s lucky to have you!” on a regular basis as they stood by the men they loved.

The media would increasingly conflate the terms of sexual assault and the various categories of rape, winnowing out the power of either of the original terms. Its overuse was starting to be recognized universally as nearly everybody soon knew someone in their community who had at least been accused of rape. A paper published by SAGE over the summer of 2022 showed empirically that between 16 and 25% of all young Americans knew people falsely or spuriously, either or both, accusing and accused of some degree of sexual assault.

Sex trials in a time of consent anxiety were a much more efficient way to get rape conviction statistics up, with government grants for crisis centers becoming something of a cash cow, and little investigation or evidence was needed to pluck the low-hanging fruit from a by-now very desiccated tree.

“Male equity now!” screamed (some) young American women following the Depp trial verdict, while the allegation remained as bad as the conviction for those who were affected by the accusations.

The seventies radical feminist dictum, “All men are rapists,” had become fact by stealth, and tenure and pensions of the prominent men on the receiving end weren’t going to change that any time soon.

Twenty-plus years of justice activism had successfully led to toxic power feminism having legal dominance in an identity politics-obsessed field where the traditional crime of rape had morphed from being a very serious act of intentional sexual violence to something where twelve people now had to first work out what it was — and if they’d in fact been guilty of it themselves the weekend before.

image_pdfimage_print
Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.

7 Thoughts to “Toxic Activism in Trials-by-Media”

Leave a Comment

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone and language of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Refrain from comments containing references to religion unless it clearly relates to the post being commented on.
  • Do not post in all caps.
  • We will generally not allow links; the moderator may consider the value of a link.
  • We will not post lengthy comments.
  • Please do not go into details about your story; post these on our Tales from the Registry.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites.
  • Please do not solicit funds.
  • If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  • All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them. It will not be displayed on the site.

  1. A Mistake They Made

    A government wanting power can do much by changing the meanings of words. Felon sex offenders have a reduced set of civil rights, and are more to the liking of a dictatorship want to be government.

  2. vinny

    What a good read this was. Thank You

  3. vinny

    They do that, to make words less innocuous! But admittedly we kind of do the same things
    Words like shadow prisons comes to mind no need to be touchy feely about it Call it what it is “Concentration Camp” Did you ever google shadow prison sounds like a place in a Harry Potter story Just Saying.

  4. Tim in WI

    The more toxic portion a radical feminism is the perpetuation of social victims stance being supported by leftist liberal attorneys. The was a day when advertising for ambulance chasers was forbidden. Naturally these lawyers sued for the abridgment of free speech and won.
    This made the situation a competitive market and mirrors the over litigious environment in place in American culture. Making victimization profitable makes suit attractive in the marginal scenario AND the completely contrived complaint scenario. American television contains much pseudo court affiliated content in programs from Judge Judith Scheindlin to Court TV the NCIS Special votes crime unit. In those programs they get the bad guy more often than not. In real life however the outcomes are not so idealistic.

  5. Tim in WI

    CBS 60 Minutes had a piece about Social media and parents who are suing. These parents say social media should do better. These parents mistakenly forget that they paid for access themselves to social media. Now they claim their children were harmed. Sex registry is a sanctioned form of state’s social media presumably for the good it provides; which isn’t much. Unless we discuss domestic surveillance and manipulation.

  6. Tim in WI

    Hmm this s SCOTUS considering what can be done with the database? Can a website designer say “That’s not my kind of Marriage?” The designer doesn’t want to do the labor. Can the web designer tell the (Gov. supported ) individual “No?” Call database upkeep what it is. LABOR. 303 creative v Elenis What’s not toxic to big data is free labor by the force of law.

  7. William Hart

    I wish there were real investigative reporters that had the time and means to dig deep into the groups that push their agendas on state legislatures. I know that one of the main ones is American Legislative Exchange Council (Alec). But I also know there are more and some want to stay hidden from the public.