YouTube vigilante faces charges stemming from “sting”

By Matt . . . A Minnesota man is facing sexual assault charges after a May 2022 incident in which the YouTuber claims that the alleged victim was coming to meet an underage decoy set up by his group, “Midwest Predator Catchers-Rochester,” on their YouTube channel. The victim in this case told law enforcement that he was chatting with a 15-year-old male and he told the juvenile that he did not want anything sexual. He said that the boy was having issues coming out as gay. Police in Rochester, Minnesota, confirmed that was a fair representation of the conversation and that the victim had no prior sex offenses. However, when confronted by a camera and the YouTube personality, the victim was hit in the face and genitals multiple times according to the criminal complaint. If convicted, the vigilante will be required to register as a sexual offender.

This is not the first time this man has had run-ins with law enforcement. Of the more than one hundred videos of stings performed by the group, only one has resulted in any arrest. In that case the vigilante was arrested along with the group’s target and charged with assault. The target was spit on and verbally threatened during the altercation.

This incident is just one of the growing number of vigilante sting operations around the country that target adults by using underage personas to try to lure adults into seemingly compromising situations. Authorities across the country have mixed views on vigilante sting operations, but the Rochester, Minnesota Police and Olmsted County Attorney’s Office released the following joint statement: “RPD investigators have talked with Mr. Johnston several times and informed him that the best way to file complaints is through the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. NCMEC properly handles evidence and works closely with law enforcement…”

The YouTube group “MrWeb” has found law enforcement in the Garden State to be welcoming of the group’s amateur sting operations, particularly in Atlantic City, New Jersey. In an interview with, MrWeb’s creator, who lives in Florida, stated, “The police and the district attorneys (in Florida) unfortunately don’t respond to me the same way. They actually hate that we do this.” The vigilante leader stated that he travels to Atlantic City because law enforcement there appreciates his group’s efforts. The police in Atlantic City in July 2022 arrested 17 individuals because of MrWeb’s stings.

Localities in New Jersey, Connecticut, and California have a history of cooperating with vigilante sex sting groups. It is not always clear which specific localities cooperate with these vigilantes, and NARSOL was unable to confirm any statewide cooperation with these groups.

While some in the vigilante groups would have the public believe that their “sting” operations are altruistic, MrWeb’s YouTube channel, which has garnered over 66 thousand subscribers, offers membership levels ranging from 99 cents per month to $24.99 monthly. Another prolific channel that purports to conduct sting operations, “People Vs. Preds,” has over 84 thousand subscribers and a “merch” store where fans can purchase $18.99 ceramic coffee mugs and $39.99 sweatshirts featuring the group’s logo. The wave has reached across the Atlantic, with one group in the UK called “UKPP2 Predator Hunter” having membership tiers ranging from 99 cents to $9.99 per month. Groups seeking to profit from these vigilante stings span the country, with one NBC report finding over 30 groups that focus on sex stings in the United States in 2019.

In 2008, the infamous TV show “To Catch a Predator,” from which the vigilante groups seem to take their inspiration, was taken off the air.  A man set to be featured as a predator on the show committed suicide. A lawsuit was filed against the networks of the show, and the show was canceled shortly after. In 2019 The Daily Mail attributed at least three suicide deaths to vigilante groups operating over YouTube.

The darker side of these vigilante groups comes from their mistakes and oversteps. The sheriff in Sandusky County, Ohio, released a statement against such groups, saying regarding “Dads Against Predators” (DAP), a local vigilante group, “Its intentions may be well-intended, but their methods and outcomes are improper and unacceptable. The ‘exposed’ individuals may be exactly what DAP says they are, but they also may not be. DAP’s careless and reckless regard for law and order and due process has resulted in the loss of life, and the situation has gotten out of hand.”

The YouTube videos of the “stings,” some of which have racked up over 1 million views, generally make no effort to blur the faces of the individuals or disclaim that they are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. The vigilante groups have been accused of being aggressive and, in the most recent case, have allegedly sexually assaulted the people they are filming. Prosecutors from across the nation have pointed to the evidentiary issues with presenting the videos to a court, and law professors have weighed in on the inadmissibility of such videos in some states.

No state has made statements of support for the vigilante behavior. To be sure, only certain localities support these types of operations. If the locality does arrest and prosecute persons using these videos, the victims of these stings face the prospect of prison time and registry. These sorts of “sting” operations, apart from being vigilante justice, contribute to putting people on a registry that does not work based on something they “might” do.

Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.

8 Thoughts to “YouTube vigilante faces charges stemming from “sting””

Leave a Comment

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone and language of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Refrain from comments containing references to religion unless it clearly relates to the post being commented on.
  • Do not post in all caps.
  • We will generally not allow links; the moderator may consider the value of a link.
  • We will not post lengthy comments.
  • Please do not go into details about your story; post these on our Tales from the Registry.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites.
  • Please do not solicit funds.
  • If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  • All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them. It will not be displayed on the site.

  1. sth

    This may seem intolerant, but this may be the one case where I feel he deserves a taste of his own medicine.

  2. w

    Do it for the fame, the democratic way. As in this is just about feeding the masses who in turn feed their egos.

    Now all he needs to do is get into politics. Hey, maybe even become sherrif! Then at least he won’t have to be “condemned” for his actions since now he’ll BE the law! I mean that’s the ultimate goal of these pr**ks. Nobody wants to stop, instead they escalate. Until the power is taken from them they continue their tirade. And when power is given to them they abuse it. And they support each other, it goes from one channel to the next. One group to another. One neighborhood to the next, and then eventually yours. Like a plague.

  3. Mistake They Made

    “The vigilante will be required to register as a sexual offender.” Welcome to the registry Mr. Vigilante! May you finally understand.

  4. H n H

    Mmhmm, the registry is performing its function well. Look at the saved lives, lives made better even! Purely a completely “civil regulation” that has never been abused, is never punitive and just for the safety of everyone. Nice job to those who helped get the Genie out of its bottle, good luck getting it back in.

    My seething anger doesn’t come close to the amount of sarcasm here.

  5. Screwed over in Mississippi

    I believe this is the whole point. These groups aren’t protecting anyone they are creating the problem. But hey it looks good for politicians and law enforcement to claim they are protecting child.

  6. James Stambaugh

    They get what they deserve. Plus if you read the court paperwork and arresting affidavits of crimes the paperwork states right on it that the cops must provide correct and truthful information about the arrest in which a sting operation is a fictitious crime which is not a true crime but yet courts accept the lies and move forth on convictions because it a mark on their jacket and also more income for the state. People need to start challenging the authenticity of the arrest warrants and challenge the oath of office.

    1. Eddie Tiemann

      People could also just not solicit and attempt to meet who they believe to be children online. Then they wouldn’t have these issues, Mr. Stambaugh. Would you agree that this is also an ingredient in a solution to the issue at hand here?

  7. David Morgan

    I have viewed a number of these sting confrontations and my thoughts are mixed. I believe that these groups are monitizing and sensationalizing these catches to generate “donations” to continuing their cause.

    Recently, I viewed a live feed where the vigilante was following the alledged predator to get his address and to send the information to the police. The person pulled off the road and the chat logs following was warning them that this person may have a gun. All the while, people donated money for gas, for subscriptions, etc. which would encourage this group to do this again could result in a less safe outcome.

    Another instance showed the trapping of a RSO who didn’t report his new address and wanted a 3-some with his 14 year old decoy and her 12 year old friend. In this case, this was a dangerous person taken off the street. So, these groups did show value.