Joliet mayor Bob O’Dekirk, please do the right thing

Also published at the Joliet Patch Publication

By Sandy . . . Much has been made recently of an apartment building in Joliet, Illinois, housing six individuals on the Illinois sex offense registry. Joliet’s mayor Bob O’Dekirk has consistently supported attempts to have the men removed. He has been very vocal about this.

Frustrated by a federal ruling superseding the state law that allows only one registered person at any given address, Mayor O’Dekirk has now announced his intent to build what is known as a “pocket park” in order to have the registrants forced out. A state law requires registrants who were convicted of offenses against a child (defined by the statute as anyone under the age of eighteen) to live more than 500 feet from schools, playgrounds, and child-care facilities. The apartment building is in compliance, as, according to their website, are all NewDay apartments.

According to his statement, the mayor is putting forth to city council at their August 2 meeting a proposal to purchase a home he has located within 500 feet of the apartments. The plan then, apparently, is to move or demolish the home and do what is necessary to declare the lot a children’s playground, thereby putting the property off limits for anyone convicted as a child sex offender.

While everyone understands and agrees with the need and duty to protect children from harm, this will best be accomplished by actions grounded in empirical evidence and with truth and facts rather than hyperbole, fear-mongering, and falsehoods.

The mayor, in an interview posted on Facebook, repeatedly attacked the owners of the apartment building in question, attacking them for building it in Joliet, “on the other side of the state” from where they lived, rather than in their own area.

The headquarters of NewDay Apartments is in Lake Zurich in Lake County. NewDay owns a dozen properties in Lake, Kane, Will, and Winnebago counties. The properties are all approved by the Illinois Dept. of Corrections and in compliance with state laws.

The rules for their tenants are strict: only one non-violent (as defined by Illinois law) sexual offense is allowed; to be considered, applicants must have no other felonies, including drug offenses; applicants must pass extensive criminal and credit background checks.

As the rationale to support his position, Mayor O’Dekirk made loud claims that recidivism among those on the registry is “extremely high,” one of the highest of all crimes.

Every aspect of that is false. Reoffense among registrants is very, very low, an average of around 5% from all reporting states, and reoffense among those with a single, non-violent offense is extremely low. The most recent Illinois study showed an across-the-board reoffense rate of 2.4% after three years (p.17). Many studies refer to sex offender reoffense as lower than every other category of crime other than murder.

The mayor is perpetuating the outdated and debunked “stranger danger” myth in taking this action. The overwhelmingly greatest threat for sexual harm to children comes from those close to them: family members, peers, and trusted acquaintances and authority figures, not strangers who may or may not also be registered persons.

When asked, a spokesperson for NewDay Apartments said, “The city of Joliet’s position that the Cora St. property should be shut down will do nothing to protect the local community.  If the city decides to build a ‘pocket park’ near Cora, NewDay will simply place registrants who are not subject to the 500′ restriction at the building.  The city’s efforts will only result in the names of the registrants at Cora St. changing.  NewDay will continue to protect communities by providing safe, affordable housing to registrants to help ensure they comply with all local laws and regulations.  To date, not a single tenant at Cora St. has even been accused of a new crime, much less convicted of one.”

The bottom line is this: Illinois law has created a large homeless population among registrants due to residency restrictions. Providing housing for as many of these individuals as possible, aside from the positive benefits for the registrants, helps create safer neighborhoods.

Mayor O’Dekirk is in a position to be a positive influence in his community simply by telling his constituents the truth. Communities are safer when those who have taken responsibility for their actions, served or are serving their punishment, and wish to build a law-abiding life as a productive member of society have access to the means with which to begin that journey.

Everyone bears the responsibility of protecting our children and maximizing the resources we have. These goals can only be reached by building on a foundation of facts and truth.

image_pdfimage_print
Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.

7 Thoughts to “Joliet mayor Bob O’Dekirk, please do the right thing”

Leave a Comment

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone and language of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Refrain from comments containing references to religion unless it clearly relates to the post being commented on.
  • Do not post in all caps.
  • We will generally not allow links; the moderator may consider the value of a link.
  • We will not post lengthy comments.
  • Please do not go into details about your story; post these on our Tales from the Registry.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites.
  • Please do not solicit funds.
  • If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  • All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them. It will not be displayed on the site.

  1. A Mistake They Made

    Just goes to show you no matter how harmless the law it can be weaponized against particular citizens. This clown mayor needs to lose his job ASAP!

  2. A Mistake They Made

    So this Mayor wants to put a pocket park on every corner to force registered citizens from living in his city? This is why you cannot have laws that apply to only one small group of people. If it does not effect the regular joe then it is permitted. Equal protections is being circumvented for public safety and they will not stop here if unchecked. They made the park law so “Tax Payers with felony convictions for sex crimes” cannot move nearby the park, not so you can make parks next to where they live to move the citizens. Someone needs to take this to court claiming he is using it against legislative intent on this. To prove it is not they have to prove the lawmakers did it to be able to eject citizens from where they are living. If it is not against legislative intent then it is unconstitutional on its face.

  3. Max Freeman

    This is proof positive that the registry serves only to further damage and ruin people’s lives who have already served their sentence. This is very inhumane and unconstitutional should by all means be abolished.
    Well indeed the children need to be safe their safety comes from the parents education and then that of the children to know that there is evil in this world people need to be aware of that and keep an eye on their children at all times.
    However those who have been convicted of a nonviolent crime constitutionally has the right to serve their sentence and resume a quality life within society.
    Again the registry only served to condemn and degrade and ruin hundreds of thousands of lives needlessly and relentlessly pursuing to do so more as time goes on.
    I myself have been forced into poverty and loneliness because of the registry. I have an associates degree in electronics and secondarily was a care worker for the elderly and or adult foster care clients.
    I could have had a good life but I was denied that right.
    Because this is a constitutional matter and a criminal act pushed into effect by the United States Congress.
    I myself am going to seek and pursue compensation to a large degree for every person whose life has been affected by the illegal unconstitutional registry.
    I would also like to hear from those who have the power to help pursue such a litigation against the United States and the state with which we individuals live in.

  4. Max Freeman

    This is proof positive that the registry only serves to provide information to help further destroy a registrants life and possibly his family’s as well.
    The registry is unconstitutional and inhumane in every possible way.
    Registrants whose lives have been destroyed by this unconstitutional law should be greatly compensated for the degradation of their life.

  5. R.Arens

    Iowa used to be this way. They changed the law when they took notice that registrants were harder to track while living a transient lifestyle. They have a 500 foot loiter law now for most S/O’s and compliance is the highest it’s ever been.

  6. WC_TN

    As true as this article is, we all know that the mayor will choose politics over facts. Litigation is the key. Surely weaponizing residency restrictions in this manner is punitive on it’s face.

  7. Jane Binner

    Odekirk was representing pedophiles recently in criminal court, so I’m unclear where this new found outrage at child predators is coming from; a couple of years ago, seems they were his bread and butter (which is odd to see a practicing attorney also a mayor of a city the size of Joliet.)
    Self-loathing hypocrite? Or just a hot-headed, emotional narcissist desperate for attention to distract from his very public troubles?