Organization in Illinois helps persons with sexual crime convictions with housing, draws wrath of vigilante neighbors

By Sandy . .  Joliet, Illinois has been making the news lately because several individuals with previous sexual crime convictions are living in an apartment building in a family-oriented neighborhood.

What a shame.

One source quotes a mother describing her daughter as coming from school “in tears because she was afraid that she was going to be snatched.”

What a shame.

What a shame that persons who have committed crimes and served the sentences for those crimes cannot find housing for themselves, and in some cases their families, because of residency restriction laws that have been shown over and over again to be of no value as a public safety initiative. Even the U.S. Justice Dept. recognizes this, writing in a publication:

“[T]he evidence is fairly clear that residence restrictions are not effective. In fact, the research suggests that residence restrictions may actually increase offender risk by undermining offender stability and the ability of the offender to obtain housing, work, and family support. There is nothing to suggest this policy should be used at this time.” (last main section)

However, in spite of the empirical evidence, state after state, Illinois included, have utilized these restrictions, creating a large homeless population, to the point that, in Illinois, the Chicago Police Dept. issued a policy statement about them.

The NewDay Apartments are successfully helping to alleviate this situation. Dedicated to making communities safer, they are a private company that builds law-compliant housing for registrants, and it is one of their buildings in Joliet that has become a focal point for the maelstrom that is being created.

The neighborhood is, almost literally, up in arms. It is clear, judging from their statements given to the press and at the community meeting, that their anxiety and their rhetoric is based on myth, misinformation, and media hype. The local Patch publication saw fit to portray the situation in the most negative manner possible and to print the mug shots, names, and crimes of conviction.

Joliet’s mayor, Bob O’Dekirk, in his political posturing to the press, promised to take action against the apartment building, adding more fuel to the fire.

Attorney Adele Nicholas, who is E.D. of NARSOL’S Illinois affiliate Illinois Voices for Reform, was at the community meeting in Joliet June 1. She reports that some of the community members were respectful, asking questions and expressing concerns in a reasonable fashion. However, what Adele describes as “a few angry, vocal people” were verbally violent, threatening to burn the apartment building, threatening murder and mutilation of the registrants. She was very disturbed at this, even more disturbed when others in the group cheered those violent threats, and yet more disturbed when not the mayor, nor a city council member, nor any member of law enforcement present, intervened in any way or told them they were inciting breaking the law.

A representative for the NewDay Apartments also expressed concern over the suggestions of illegal violence and vigilantism. He stressed that NewDay’s first and major concern is community safety for everyone. All of their clients are one-time offenders, and he says that, to the best of his memory, not a single one offended against a stranger; every crime was against a relative or someone else he knew, which is true for the vast majority of sexual crime, most especially against children.

What a shame that no media is pointing out the facts about the danger actually posed by registrants living in the community and that children being “snatched” off of the street by someone on the registry is a rare, rare thing.

What a shame that children, hearing the hysteria and fear of their elders, are terrified to play outside.

What a shame that, in a room full of public servants sworn to uphold the law, not a single one spoke out in the face of threats of illegal activities such as violence, arson, and murder.

What a shame that we, as a nation, proclaim that we want people who commit crimes to be rehabilitated and have the opportunities to rebuild their lives and not reoffend and then make laws and take actions that are in direct opposition to what is needed for that to happen.

What a shame.

Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.

5 Thoughts to “Organization in Illinois helps persons with sexual crime convictions with housing, draws wrath of vigilante neighbors”

Leave a Comment

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone and language of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Refrain from comments containing references to religion unless it clearly relates to the post being commented on.
  • Do not post in all caps.
  • We will generally not allow links; the moderator may consider the value of a link.
  • We will not post lengthy comments.
  • Please do not go into details about your story; post these on our Tales from the Registry.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites.
  • Please do not solicit funds.
  • If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  • All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them. It will not be displayed on the site.

  1. Nicole Roberson

    I am commenting on the topic of past sex offenders. These guys have served their time for their crimes and have the lowest rate of any repeat offenses than murderers. Rehabilitated individuals should be allowed to try to have a second chance at life. They have loved ones that love and care for them and should not be continuously persecuted, if they are deemed rehabilitated by the state.

    1. Tim in WI

      Boy I sure wish I knew of this so I could have been there.
      I’m sure Adele was polite to the person individuals displaying anger. I would have confronted their cowardly complaints. It is Illinois! You gotta have lots of courage just to drive on their streets, and Illinois interstate highways are very dangerous indeed. Talk about risk. Illinois has no shortage of gun violence either. So what possible excuse do they have? Their complaints are empty of reason and full of emotion.

      The people who would demanded “notice” by a process of law and subsequently complain or protest about the lawful notification provided to the people and process exposes an alternate impetus behind the regime that notice itself evolved from.
      The State’s denied affirmative restraint was intended behind the SOR electronic notification regime provisions. Questions concerning the extraordinary extraneous information demanded highlights the interests are in advancement toward the uses of database collective.
      Chips are in the news recently. Chips are indeed itty bitty database. Chips in particular serve control function. I won’t bore readers with how, but chips are generally considered slave databases for a larger system. American leadership lost control of database manufacturing… BIG! Mistake!
      Sex offenders were merely the first to become subservient to what the purveyors deem to be appropriate use.

    2. Christopher L Melton

      Thank you some of us made bad choices in our lives it doesn’t make us bad people some of us have changed our lives totally around turn it over to God working and trying to build in our community trying to be there for a families that was in my past over 20 some odd years ago the state of Illinois is still holding it against me and causing me great grief

  2. Lorie

    Hi ,
    This may have went a very different way if Newday apartments introduced themselves as did the attorney to give the neighborhood some insight instead of somehow just appearing , then leaving it up to the community to “ figure” all this out – Newday apartments were not at the meeting that now they are claiming this neighborhood is aggregent
    I’m glad Newday apartments “claim” to be helping neighborhoods & registrants which not one of the 5 are from will county & of which are on parole
    Open housing in each county for that counties registrants
    Thank you for your time

    1. Tim in WI

      Thanks for your input. The reason New day is operating is a problem created by the people themselves. We see all sorts of similar enterprise looming to house offenders… For a price. Indeed this behavior is recognized as normal “rent seeking behavior” by firms speculation in property ownership found in micro economics literature. Housing offenders by contract mimics Section 8 housing programs for wage inhibited individuals. With incredibly low borrowing rates, property is purchased by firms then filled with gov funded renters and then sold to another larger firm because of the attractive rental agreement contacts and recognized profit potential. Firms like New Day could sit on the property and collect, but these firms generally do not stick around the community. You wrote New Day did not make an appearance, I believe I’ve explained why.