Sex offense registration for life unconstitutional, says SC Supreme Court

By Meg Kinnard . . . South Carolina’s Supreme Court says a state law requiring sex offenders to register for life without prior judicial review is unconstitutional . . .

According to the FAQ section of the state’s registry website, an offender will only be removed from the registry if the offense is “reversed, overturned, or vacated on appeal and a final judgment has been rendered,” or if they were pardoned.

In 2010, a man named Dennis Powell was convicted for criminal solicitation of a minor.

According to the Supreme Court ruling, Investigators said he was in an internet chat room in 2008 and planned to meet a 12-year-old girl at a skating rink in Lexington, but he was actually talking to an undercover officer . . . Powell was arrested, indicted, plead guilty, served his time and probation, and received psychiatric treatment.

Powell was told at his sentencing he had to register as a sex offender for life and has done so for more than ten years now.

Two doctors said he was low-risk for re-offending, the court said.

In 2016, Powell filed a petition with Circuit Court saying that requiring him to register for the rest of his life was excessive and deprived him of due process and equal protection . . .

The state Supreme Court upheld the Circuit Court decision and said Powell should be taken off the registry immediately.

The Circuit Court agreed with him, but the State Law Enforcement Division appealed the decision to the state Supreme Court.

That’s the decision we saw come out today.

The Supreme Court said it’s not constitutional to require offenders to register for the rest of their life without a chance to see if they are actually high risk to re-offend.

The ruling said, “The lifetime inclusion of individuals who have a low risk of re-offending renders the registry over-inclusive and dilutes its utility by creating an ever-growing list of registrants that is less effective at protecting the public and meeting the needs of law enforcement… Moreover, there is no evidence [that]… all sex offenders generally pose a high risk of re-offending.”

The Circuit Court also said that 1994 sex offender law didn’t allow for publishing the registry online.

But the Supreme Court did not uphold that part of this case, which means South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) can continue posting the registry on the internet.

The Court gave the General Assembly twelve months to rewrite the law and provide sex offenders a chance for judicial review . . .

Berkeley County Sheriff Duane Lewis said the ruling will likely not impact his county-level law enforcement operations much.

“The sex offender registry is very important to the safety and security of residents in our 46 counties,” Lewis said. “Many people rely on the registry to make decisions about where to live. Employers use it as well to check applicants to jobs. It’s an excellent opportunity to help protect citizens.” . . .

Justices called South Carolina’s sex offender law “the most stringent in the country.”

Read the full piece here at AP News.

Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.

Viewing 2 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #84129 Reply

      Mike

      This is good to hear. I’ve been thinking of challenging my need to be on the registry in Michigan. Currently on year 11 out of 25. Stayed clean and clear the entire time.

    • #84264 Reply

      Matthew Stephenson

      Just to be sure I understand what is happening.
      1.Did the court determined it was inconsistent with the US Constitution or with a state constitution?

      2. Is the ruling limited solely to lifetime supervision, or does it have any implications for registration in the state in general?

      3. How helpful is this as precedent in litigation outside of SC?

    • #84297 Reply

      Aj

      It is good to see another state come to their senses on this lifetime registration situation, all of which began in 1 state, then went like dominoes throughout the U.S.
      However, this is just that, a state. One can try to set precedence by filing in your prevailing state.
      I’ve consulted many Lawyers on my case, i hear the same story, 50,000.00 bucks or more, with NO guarentee of winning the case or getting off the lifetime registry.
      The United States Supreme Court rules it is not punishment, Until the Attorney General of the U.S.
      Says it is or the Supreme Court finally sees it for what it is, i see no changes, some small victories, but one needs to win the war.
      I have been subjected to laws passed 15 yrs after my sentence, and 20 yrs after my sentence i was put on lifetime registration.
      I live in another State, so am subject to 2 sets of rules. On one registration form i am informed to initial every rule, whether or not it applies to me.
      My crime was 39 yrs ago. I was 29. I will be 69 in 2 weeks. Not even the same person.
      The registry needs to stop period.

Viewing 2 reply threads
Reply To: Sex offense registration for life unconstitutional, says SC Supreme Court
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

  • *DO NOT POST LINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES
Your information:





<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">