Laws driven by misinformation or by facts — which should we strive for?

By Dwayne . . . You may know someone or have heard through news sources of individuals ordered by courts to attend sexual offender treatment. It is relatively common for courts to mandate forms of “therapy” such as polygraphs, group sessions, and elaborate treatment programs claiming efficacy. While the science community is skeptical of the effectiveness of such schemes, there are defenders with artificial data that cling to it fanatically.

But before I dive into the treatment programs, let us take a moment to reflect that we have seen this hype on various levels before. There was a time when marijuana use was a “gateway drug” that was sure to lead to other serious drugs and a life of crime. Let us not forget how homosexuality was targeted as an “incurable disease” where some were forced into conversion therapy and treatment programs. In each scenario, polygraph exams were sometimes administered to determine if the person was credible to hold a license or pursue a specific career or, conversely, was deemed a threat to society. Those that resisted the notion that they were a threat were quickly labeled as living in denial and often punished for non-conformity.

Let me be clear that there is an extreme difference between addiction versus “caught up in a moment.” Most sex crimes today are either caught up in a moment via the internet or in a situational circumstance of one-time poor decision making. These are not long-term addictions, nor are they gateway fantasies. Society, however, would insist that a one-time usage of marijuana is a sign of addiction and that past experimentation of homosexuality during college immediately labels that person as perpetually bisexual or gay. It is as if communities have a curious fetish about labeling one another with serious depravities — or what they consider depravities — and then creating fanciful “cures” for them, cures that ignore the science and evidence.

Sex-related crimes in America today are, for the most part, not indicative of addictive behaviors. While data shows that sex crimes are, in most cases, with someone known by the victim, people still cling to the notion that sexual assaults are habitual and lurking at every corner, perpetuated by strangers in raincoats either hiding behind a bush or driving a white van.

I would argue that a majority of sex crimes become so labeled due to confusion about what constitutes consent and due to issues with communication. To the science community, it is not rational to punish a person with life-long consequences and tag him or her as a sexual deviant. However, it is excellent public theater to make examples of others to hold up to the general masses. If this technique is effective in reducing sexual assaults, then why are sex registries growing at an alarming rate?

The short answer is that perhaps we are overinflating the issue similar to how we justified the war on drugs, the issue of homosexuality, and other issues that were in their time labeled and touted as “a threat to American values.”

To be crystal clear, forcing polygraphs and therapy on people does not remedy any behaviors. While there may be a few with sexually addictive behaviors, we should be mindful that our judicial system shouldn’t be in the business of mandating hocus-pocus remedies in the belief that they are correcting the problem. Perhaps the best treatment is for communities to quit trying to invent the next bogyman and instead listen to the scientific community about what constitutes best treatment for those who are labeled “sex offenders.”

Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.

Dwayne is actively involved in legislative concerns around sex offense policy and human rights policies. He is a NARSOL board member, an integral part of NCRSOL, and is also currently engaged with Vivante Espero by recruiting lawyers in a pro bono capacity.

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #84087 Reply

      A Mistake They Made

      Nice article Dwayne!!

      • #84094 Reply

        Dwayne Daughtry

        thank you very much for the kind comment.

    • #84117 Reply

      Facts should matter

      When it comes to lawmakers trotting out all these ill-conceived sex laws, it’s not what they know or can prove, it’s what they can get people to believe. Mothers in particular are susceptible to the false sense of empowerment they firmly believe the registry provides.them. Whatever, but I’m not willing to live stressed out for others’ peace of mind and illusory relief.

    • #84223 Reply

      Socrates III

      Dwayne, very nice piece, thank you. Now, a question and an observation. Question: in your opinion, why is it that even in the face of overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, that people, especially suburban soccer moms, still prefer to believe that all who have committed a sex crime is a continuing threat? Observation: The suffix “er” when added to an “action verb”, e.g., “OFFEND”, and applied to an individual, connotes that this is what this individual is and what he does on a continuing bases, e.g.,: “fire fight(er)” or “police offic(er)”. So it is with an individual labeled “sex offend(er)”. Your observation?

    • #84210 Reply

      Perry P.

      Excellent Article Mr. Daughtry. You are so ‘Spot-On’ about the reasons the Registry is what it is today, that if Congress actually listened to you, perhaps, just perhaps there would be an actual real effort to change the Registry or just plain eradicate it altogether. I doubt it will happen in my lifetime, yet, I hope that someday within the next 20 years, it just might. At the very least; change it such that only Law Enforcement have access to it, as originally intended, and not the General Public so Vigilantes won’t go Hunting Us to hurt or outright kill Us…like they are now. Look. Polygraphs are yet another Money Making Scheme, that hides behind ‘Assurance of Compliance to Treatment’, and I’m glad to see that you touched on the fact that forcing Us to endure such ‘Treatment’, does absolutely no good. If anything; it only gives Us even more reasons to be or become, even more resentful of the Registry as a whole! They also easily forget how the Registry affects Families of Registrants and The Children in them as well. Who’s protecting them from Bullies? Who’s keeping many such kids from committing Suicides because of a Parent or other Family Member on the Registry? No One. Such Legislators that continue piling on requirement after requirement, must believe they don’t count. Then there’s the Lifetime Requirement: I’ve often imagined myself being 70, or even 80 years old, and still having to go Register and comply with Treatment once a month. I don’t see even having a potential Age Appropriate Relationship with a Lady by then, because no Woman will want to be with me. I’ll end up dying alone and I am most afraid of that to be honest. Then there’s the fact that some States won’t ever consider making such changes in their State Legislatures. Doing so would assure those holding seats as Representatives, would lose them in the next Election Cycle because they actually looked at The Real Science Data of Registry Effectiveness, instead of Scare-Tactic Misinformation. So I Thank You from the bottom of my heart Sir.
      Nuff Said!

Viewing 3 reply threads
Reply To: Laws driven by misinformation or by facts — which should we strive for?
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

  • *DO NOT POST LINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES
Your information:





<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">