State cannot continue incarceration without sufficient evidence

By Christian M. Wade . . . BOSTON — More than 120 “dangerous” sex offenders have been released under a 2008 Supreme Judicial Court ruling that keeps them from being locked up if at least two “qualified medical examiners” determine they’re no longer a threat, according to state data.

The state Department of Correction currently oversees about 130 sexually dangerous prisoners held under civil commitments. Most are housed at a medium security treatment center at the Bridgewater Correctional Complex.

From 2009 to Oct. 1, 2020, at least 123 individuals were released from the program because the state lacked “sufficient evidence” under the SJC’s ruling to keep them locked up, according to state records.

Another 75 individuals were discharged after a jury determined that they were no longer sexually dangerous.

Details about the cases were not available, and it isn’t clear from Department of Correction records if the individuals were set free or transferred to other facilities.

The SJC’s 2008 ruling that called for their release involved convicted child rapist George Johnstone, of Fall River, who pleaded guilty in 1992 to two counts of indecent assault and battery on a child under 14.

Johnstone was sent to prison for 10 years. Afterward his sentence was complete, he was held under the state’s civil commitment law, which allows for the jailing of sex offenders deemed to be a public danger, and required to undergo sex offender treatment.

Johnstone petitioned for release in 2003, and the case went to trial three years later.

Two medical examiners testified that Johnstone was no longer sexually dangerous. The high court rejected an argument by the state that he should be held anyway, saying it lacked the expert testimony needed to keep him locked up.

In doing so, the SJC set a precedent that the state must have testimony from at least one examiner saying someone is sexually dangerous in order to prompt a trial to determine if that person continues to be held.

Read the rest of the piece here at The Eagle Tribune.

Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #83201 Reply

      Dustin

      Funny how drug offenders (users and dealers) are constantly portrayed as being in need of “treatment” as opposed to re-incarceration, yet none of them are referred to these not-a-prison “treatment facilities” despite repeatedly and consistently doing exactly what landed them in the criminal justice system in the first place.

    • #83262 Reply

      Tim in WI

      The fact is he was re- incarcerated before a jury & civil trial, and without due process.
      “He filed in 2003 for decisions three years later.” They ( prosecutors ) do not necessarily need real evidence to convict in America. Accusations and innuendo are enough.

    • #83341 Reply

      A Mistake They Made

      Imagine that! The State having to prove something before doing harm to a citizen. Seems i read this somewhere before why was this even a question? Ya Ya the government thinks there is a magic word called public safety that trumps the constitution whenever convenient.

    • #83383 Reply

      David Lee Sturtz

      I still do not understand how any court, let alone the US Supreme count can say that registration is not a punishment. Using that logic you say it safer to leave all convicted felons in prison indefinitely and state that prison is not really a punishment. Redefine punishment and you can do anything to anyone.

Viewing 3 reply threads
Reply To: State cannot continue incarceration without sufficient evidence
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

  • *DO NOT POST LINKS TO OTHER WEBSITES
Your information:





<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">