Kansas Legislature considers registry changes

The Hutchinson News

The state’s offender registry began with efforts to track sex offenders. Over the past two decades, the registry has expanded to a wide range of crimes, including violent crimes and drug offenses. Kansas now adds more than 1,000 offenders a year to registries after they have completed other sentencing, all of which will likely remain on the registry for at least 15 years, the Kansas minimum for most offenders.

The state has one of the most broad registries in America, leading Kansas law enforcement to track over 20,000 offenders. All offenders, regardless of crime, must check in with law enforcement four times a year and pay $20, more often if they make changes in job, create new social media accounts, get tattoos or make other changes.

Anecdotal stories of support for registries abound. Many Kansans undoubtedly like knowing if someone with a criminal history has moved into their neighborhood. However, despite decades of use and billions of dollars in law enforcement spending, there is little evidence that registries actually prevent crime.

A University of Michigan analysis of decades of research on sex offender registries, for example, found “no reliable evidence that these laws work to reduce sex offender recidivism (despite years and years of effort), and some evidence (and plenty of expert sentiment) … that these laws may increase sex offender recidivism” the author further explained, “to be deterred, potential offenders must have something to lose.”

Read full article

Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.


Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    • #68736 Reply
      Tim in WI

      The author’s reference to ” nothing to lose” reminded me of The President’s campaign woo to inner city black vote, ” what the hell do you have to loose. ”

      It also reminded me the increasing prison time for sex assault will lead to more deaths and not less. Attack begets more violence not less.

Viewing 0 reply threads
Reply To: Kansas Legislature considers registry changes
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

Your information:

<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">