State must provide due process, says NARSOL’S N.M affiliate LJC

image_pdfimage_print

By Robert Nott . . . The question of whether sex offenders must register in New Mexico for crimes they committed in other states is making its way through the courts again.

Eight plaintiffs, each listed as “John Doe,” have filed a petition in U.S. District Court in New Mexico, alleging the state Department of Public Safety and five county sheriffs failed to provide them due process in determining whether their out-of-state offense is “equivalent” to a New Mexico crime that would require them to register in this state.

Albuquerque-based lawyers Susan Burgess-Farrell and Barrett G. Porter, and the nonprofit Liberty and Justice Coalition, filed the lawsuit in late October on behalf of the “John Does” who already have been required to register as sex offenders in New Mexico.

The petition says the sheriffs and the Department of Public Safety, which is responsible for operating and maintaining New Mexico’s sex offender registry, failed to set up a procedural due process to properly review their cases in a timely manner.

“No notice,” the petition says. “No right to discover the evidence relied upon. No hearing in which to present evidence. No neutral decision maker. No mechanism for appealing the decision.”

Several of the plaintiffs have been waiting for a determination on a “translation” list for “several years,” the court document says. Meanwhile, they risk loss of job and housing opportunities, damage to their reputation and must report to the local sheriff every 90 days, according to the petition. Offenders are also subject to online publication of their crimes.

Under New Mexico law, a person convicted of any of 12 sex offenses or who is convicted of an “equivalent” offense must register with the sheriff of the county in which the offender lives. Failing to register is a fourth-degree felony in New Mexico, which can lead to an 18-month prison sentence.

Ashley Reymore-Cloud, a lawyer for the nonprofit Liberty and Justice Coalition, said this lawsuit is not the first to address state issues with “translation of equivalent crimes” for out-of-state sex offenders.

Read the full article here at santafenewmexican.com

image_pdfimage_print
Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.

Leave a Comment

We welcome a lively discussion with all view points - keeping in mind...

  • Your submission will be reviewed by one of our volunteer moderators. Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • Please keep the tone and language of your comment civil and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • Please stay on topic - both in terms of the organization in general and this post in particular.
  • Refrain from general political statements in (dis)favor of one of the major parties or their representatives.
  • Refrain from comments containing references to religion unless it clearly relates to the post being commented on.
  • Do not post in all caps.
  • We will generally not allow links; the moderator may consider the value of a link.
  • We will not post lengthy comments.
  • Please don not go into details about your story; post these on our Tales from the Registry.
  • Please choose a user name that does not contain links to other web sites.
  • Please do not solicit funds.
  • If you use any abbreviation such as Failure To Register (FTR), the first time you use it please expand it for new people to better understand.
  • All commenters are required to provide a real email address where we can contact them. It will not be displayed on the site.