Don’t want people to act like monsters? Then don’t call them monsters

Originally published July 16, 2016, at With Justice for All

By “Shelly Stow” . . . If things really come in threes, then I have a monster story yet to come my way.

The first one was when an editor wrote a “Pokemon warning” to his readers and chose to call registrants living in the area “the real monsters.” I took exception to that verbiage and, after contacting him, sent my rebuttal, which he, in decency, printed.

Now, this morning, when I opened my usual collection of daily alerts, one shouted at me, “Monsters among us site provides digital vigilance to help you keep track of sexual predators…” The thing turned out to be nothing more than an advertisement for Family Watchdog [now behind a paywall] masquerading as a site review, but my initial reaction was, again, my radar going on high alert at the word “monsters” being used to describe those on the registry.

At the end of the piece was a request for readers to share their favorite sites for him to review. I took him up on it, sending him the following. Time will tell if I get a response.

Dear Mr. O’Neill,

Thank you for the invitation to share a favorite site. The one I would like to share is It is the site of National Reform Sex Offender Laws, Inc., and it is dedicated to the advocacy of laws and policies based on facts and evidence that support the successful rehabilitation and reintegration of law abiding, former sex offenders into society. This is our goal because this is what research shows will help create a safer society.

Unlike the site you most recently recommended, we do not call people “monsters.” Research indicates that pejorative language of that type is counter-productive in furthering the rehabilitation initiatives approved by our criminal justice system.

Additionally, we find the type of site touted in your article “Monsters among us site…” contradictory to empirical evidence, and we find companies such as Family Watchdog extremely unethical as they are using deceit to play on the fears of parents. An exhaustive look at the research and scholarly literature on the subject will reveal that evidence does not support the use of public notification such as public sex offender registries. These popular but wasteful schemes do not further public safety, reduce sexual re-offending, nor offer any protection to children or other potential victims. They are predicated on misconceptions and myths and are denounced by academics and scientists alike.

I will be happy to dialogue with you further on this subject. Thank you for considering the site I have recommended for your column.

Addendum: “Shelly” reports that she did not get a response from Mr. O’Neill

Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.

Sandy Rozek

Sandy is communications director for NARSOL, editor-in-chief of the Digest, and a writer for the Digest and the NARSOL website. Additionally, she participates in updating and managing the website and assisting with a variety of organizational tasks.

Viewing 3 reply threads
  • Author
    • #61377 Reply

      Well Stated!

    • #62248 Reply

      Thank you for speaking truth.

    • #62365 Reply

      What a bumbling nightmare a lot or many can go thru thru with this ordeal of the sex registry plight. Stepping up to issues is good. Even one of the many presidents stepped up to the issues with true understanding. That person was Jimmy Carter. View’s on speaking out on issues in his day were good if they are based on true understanding & wisdom. Who is manulipating in this Dr. Jeckle or Mr. Hyde ordeal or where does Erase the Hate come infor mankind or does hatred stirreth up strife.

      Oh yes we can go thru so many pitfalls of life in many ways but with this sex offender do all roads lead to Rome or the distruction of Rome in this type of manulipation. WE as the people on the registry have a challenge to help others and yes helping others in this sex offender plight is worth while and challenging .

      Yes we can all get out of the boat and make a difference and speak out to put an end many or much of this registry whether thru Rational Laws, abolishment, or other means we all can make a different to help others in this America.

    • #62419 Reply
      Tim in WI

      The behavior of name calling is well documented and studied. You may thank your leadership for supporting it on a world wide scale via SOR. The civil nature of the congressional impetus for online ad hominem attack was approved by the great authority of the United States supreme court in 2003, and promulgated under the guise of public safety and the benefit of the vulnerable. I still say those choices were far more about the machine regime than the violent man.

Viewing 3 reply threads
Reply To: Don’t want people to act like monsters? Then don’t call them monsters
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

Your information:

<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">