“Sex offenders’ prison deaths often are ‘choreographed’ “

Used with permission

By Chandra Bozelko and Ryan Lo . . . Many people aren’t buying the official “suicide” story from the Manhattan Correctional Complex that housed financier and registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein on suicide watch until late July. Theories that Epstein was murdered to protect any number of political cabals are widespread on social media. President Trump has suggested that Bill and Hillary Clinton were involved and the Resistance is convinced that someone offed Epstein to protect the president.

That dead men tell no tales is a seductive explanation for Epstein’s expiration, but it ignores correctional reality. Epstein was vulnerable for reasons that have nothing to do with the ostensible secrets he might have kept on powerful people. Because he was convicted of sex crimes against children, Epstein was one of the most likely prison targets.

As former prisoners ourselves, we know violence and abuse in prisons aren’t always the result of supervisory vacuums. In fact, deaths of people accused of sex offenses are rarely accidental; they’re highly choreographed and implicitly endorsed executions.

No woman convicted of a sex crime has ever been killed, but they’ve been beaten, usually under the guise of another dispute. The same is not true in men’s prisons, where the ire directed at sex crimes can be fatal.

The Associated Press analyzed data on murders of sex offenders behind bars. Until 2007, reports of prisoner homicides didn’t include the crimes that incarcerated the victims, so, historically speaking, killing sex offenders might have been a bigger problem than we know.

The AP found that, in California, a third of all inmate homicides happen to sex offenders. That may not seem like much. But when you consider that the California corrections system is rife with gang warfare, the fact that one third of these victims were almost definitely not in gangs is telling.

Years ago, half of all inmates murdered in Maine’s prisons system were convicted of sex offenses. A quarter of Oklahoma’s inmate homicide victims in 10 years bore convictions for sex crimes. At a conservative estimate, 75 percent of murder victims in Nebraska prisons were sex offenders.

None of these statistics offends many people; safeguarding sex offenders is repugnant to most.

If, in theory, Epstein was murdered by another inmate (right now there’s no public evidence of that) we must use this opportunity to remind people that prisoners who’ve been convicted of sex offenses don’t deserve to be dispatched without due process. We’re not pleading for sympathy for people who cause sexual harm. Rather, we are pointing out that labeling them as subhuman has completely warped our understanding of crime and accountability. Murder is practically approved when it comes to this class of inmates. Twitter wove threads of glee at Epstein’s demise.

Prison administrators are often complicit with these homicides. When one inmate in the Tarrant County, Texas Jail killed his cellmate, a man convicted of sex crimes against children, an officer and two nurses watched the attack for 11 minutes before intervening. While investigators ferreted out and charged the inmates who assaulted guards and started fires in the 2015 Nebraska prison riot that left two men convicted of sex crimes dead, no one has solved the murder mysteries from those same events.

When prisoners are charged with violently taking the life of a sex offender, the public hails them as heroes as they did with Steven Sandison, a Michigan inmate who murdered his cellmate because of sex crimes he committed. Sandison had asked not to be housed with his victim because he knew he would kill him, yet authorities paired them up anyway.

We live in an era of exoneration, and that applies to sex crimes, too, although we don’t know how much. A study conducted by the Urban Institute that used DNA analysis to retest certain crimes found that, out of 422 convictions for sex crimes, subsequent forensic testing was inculpatory — supporting guilt — in only 187 cases, or 44 percent. That means that 56 percent of convictions of sexual assault might be attached to innocent people. Killing sex offenders isn’t just morally unjustifiable; sometimes it’s based on misinformation.

More than just the nature of sex crimes fuels the rage against people who’ve committed them, like the fact that police so often ignore and doubt complaints of these offenses. Out of 1,000 sexual assaults, 995 perpetrators escape responsibility. Indeed, even Epstein received special treatment in being allowed to leave the Palm Beach County jail six days a week. Justice eludes sex-crime victims so often that we seek any form of answerability, even if it means supporting the commission of another violent crime.

Let’s not forget that there’s a middle road to take, one where we can administer accountability to people like Epstein and restoration to their victims, but also recognize our ethical obligation to protect life and refuse to celebrate an untimely death.

Originally posted at the Miami Herald.

Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.


This topic contains 4 replies, has 2 voices, and was last updated by Avatar Saddles 19 hours, 40 minutes ago.

  • Author
  • #58960 Reply

    Used with permission By Chandra Bozelko and Ryan Lo . . . Many people aren’t buying the official “suicide” story from the Manhattan Correctional Compl
    [See the full post at: “Sex offenders’ prison deaths often are ‘choreographed’ “]

  • #58970 Reply

    What angers me, actually really angers me, is that the law enforcement gave him special priveleges for years that you or I could never have got, because he had money. All of those officers involved in that should be fired, charged with complicity and obstruction of justice, and put into prison themselves as examples to all law enforcement. Oh…..my bad……what was I thinking……..people in the law enforcement and justice system are super good people who only make ‘honest mistakes’.
    Last time I checked, all people in the enforcement and justice system put their pants on the same way we do-one leg at a time, and because they are the ones entrusted by the people to do proper justice, they should be held doubly accountable for their criminal actions hands down because they hold a position of civil authority!!! Criminals arresting, judging, and incarcerating criminals. Welcome the American justice system.

    • #59258 Reply
      William Gratchic

      In 2008, Alex Acosta was informed by the CIA, that Epstein was an “asset” to them and MASAD and was to give him an easy plea deal. This was wrong and the fact that Obama and the media hamstrung any real followup to this only shows how corrupt and hypocritical our two tiered judicial system is.

      Even now, the Epstein “suicide” is riddled with inconsistencies. The guards purportedly asleep and others that allegedly falsified the records should have been charged as well as having been fired. No video record is also inconsistent with safeguarding many inmate. When I worked as an RN in corrections, a high profile inmate would have been removed to another cell. Being a prior suicide risk, he would have kept in direct eyesight in the most proximal cell and maintenance would have been called in to fix the camera asap.

      His cellmate, who was transferred out the day before, was said to have expressed that any reporting by him of what he knew would have resulted in his death. The fact that the “Daily Post” was able to get a photo as he was boarded into an ambulance is very suspicious. Why did they have a photoshopped picture of Ghislaine Maxwell eating at an L.A. “In and Out” fast food restaurant published and not verified. It was determined to be a fraud two days later.
      All of these variables lead many to believe this was a staged affair so as to get him out under witness protection since he was an asset.

      In any event, his treatment is unlike others accused of sex crimes. As an inmate, the offender is a marked person with no empathy from staff, for sure. The disdain for these folks continues to intensify and unless something dramatic occurs to reverse the way the public is being conditioned by the media and politicians, reversal of this situation appears grim.

      Without apology.

  • #59299 Reply

    Why is it not a mandate or law that people convicted of these crimes be put in a safer prison where more of the same people are incarcerated. There is no excuse for any murder in prison for any reason. And don’t tell me the gang members haven’t egaged in similar crimes but never caught. I think we all know better. So sad, it needs not to happen at all.

  • #60000 Reply

    You know there is nothing worse than a woman scorn, well there is nothing worse than a man being taking advanage of also. While those woman are coming forth in the wake of the Epstein ordeal, one would have to say any type of death is tragic. Even with the death of Epstein all this opens up a sort of chapter about power people in high places and how these women were manipulated and used.While death is bad enough who has the death sentense in these internet sex games induced by government.

    While this dateline series on TV is challanging for these women to talk about and this grooming and other uncanny bits of torture to these unsuspecting teens, were attracted by this influence and other fast talking factors. Yes call it all grooming all the way for these teens but it is heart breaking to say the least and shameful

    Put in prospective isn’t the sex offender registry internet ordeals just like a grooming experience but actually who does it protect in these callous ordeals. Can one prevent by one inducing something bad? Yes death is bad enough but with these internet sting operations and influences of this type of underhanded grooming who is pick-pocketing who’s pocket. Yes much if not all of it should be abolished. One can call this some sort of civil type or persuasive grooming but who is rattling who’s cage with this miscarriage of justice by inducment. It even goes against ethic’s so where are moral value’s today. I’m sure its not in government.

Reply To: “Sex offenders’ prison deaths often are ‘choreographed’ “
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post links to other websites
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.
Your information:

<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre> <em> <strong> <del datetime=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">

Printer Friendly Version Printer Friendly Version