NARSOL attending defense lawyers’ defending sex cases conference

Exhibiting for NARSOL in its fourth year at the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers’ annual Las Vegas seminar at Planet Hollywood November 15 and 16 were Legal Director Larry Neely of New Mexico, volunteer Stephen May of Arizona, and attorney King Alexander of Louisiana. This year’s seminar was titled “Defending the Unthinkable: Zealous Advocacy in Sex Offense and Child Victim Cases.”

NARSOL’s team drew a prime location for its display and interacted with approximately 100 attendees, mostly attorneys, but  investigators and other exhibitors also showed interest. Those who signed up  for further contact and a chance to win a free registration at the next 11th NARSOL National Conference in Houston June 7 – 9 are from states around the country as well as from Canada.

Among the attorneys were some who litigate plaintiff civil rights cases, which is the object of NARSOL’s Scarlet Legal Action Project. The toy sharks touting SLAP and the newly-enhanced “You Can Win” sheet showing statutory attorneys’ fees awards in successful cases were especially popular with the attendees.  This conference is but one example of your donations at work. Connections made  carry over into our advocacy in that we are building our network of attorneys.

Help us reach more people by Sharing or Liking this post.


Viewing 0 reply threads
  • Author
    • #50750 Reply
      Paul Peatry

      I would like to know if you could have a agg. Criminal sexual abuse case reversed do to no proof and was falsely accused? There was a false police report and I was forced to signed a confession. Never had a background before this, and I can barely feed my family now. I can’t get a job, need your help. I have all the proof and witnesses you need.

      • #51232 Reply

        Nice to see you here. What state you in? I’m a cheesehead, smack on Illinois’ border tween the two.. I demanded a jury trial for the assault in 1992. 1 day deal, I’d no clue who did it tho, IDK, but she said she thought it was me, but whatever went down they found nothing. So why did the mom try to apologize the night before I left for Waupon. Quite a scene that was. 1210 days in for another’s doing and still doing ( his) paper. “An indeterminate term not to exceed 5 five years consecutively,” altered to life time SOR in the dark.
        It seems a five year commitment required due process, but the life term.. not so much. Wasn’t present that day; my lawyer if. DNA or biological evidence , none! + testimony of a clean up by the mom. Asked for alibi defense he had me account on paper, easy enough I worked a lot but the time frame was difficullt. Hard to prove the negative. Juries tend to hedge toward victim, naturally. What is weird the they justified one thing and a bait and switch occurred, pathological necessity to loddy, doddy, & everybody. That was the play all along. Scapegoats for electronic Surveillance Saints ….nuff said.

Viewing 0 reply threads
Reply To: NARSOL attending defense lawyers’ defending sex cases conference
We welcome a lively discussion with all view points provided that they stay on topic - keeping in mind...

  • *You must be 18 or older to comment.
  • *You must check the "I am not a robot" box and follow the recaptcha instructions.
  • *Your submission must be approved by a NARSOL moderator.
  • *Moderating decisions may be subjective.
  • *Comments arguing about political or religious preferences will be deleted.
  • *Excessively long replies will be rejected, without explanation.
  • *Be polite and courteous. This is a public forum.
  • *Do not post in ALL CAPS.
  • *Stay on topic.
  • *Do not post contact information for yourself or another person.
  • *Please enter a name that does not contain links to other websites.

Your information:

<a href="" title="" rel="" target=""> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <pre class=""> <em> <strong> <del datetime="" cite=""> <ins datetime="" cite=""> <ul> <ol start=""> <li> <img src="" border="" alt="" height="" width="">